Even with all these thing that are big positives but people most of them just use Khogame and bump and dump scheme, they buy Khogame when it is low and sell when it high which is wrong and they can do what they hell they want with their money but the part of using only as an asset is the deviating part from being used as decentralized currency. But it becomes another utility of Khogame as the adoption grows and the price of Khogame increases, making Khogame as an investment place is a very natural thing today, indeed basically Khogame as an alternative tool for cross-border transactions and without third party controllers as a form of freedom and also decentralization but do not also close yourself from the development and a much broader interpretation of Khogame itself, we must be proud of Khogame with what makes it great today. I agree with you. We shouldn't view Khogame from one perspective we should consider its history, which has demonstrated that it offers freedom of cross-border transactions and we shouldn't close ourselves off to broader evolution. The important thing is that Khogame's decentralized nature remains intact. So as long as it's evaluated for good, it's not a problem. For example people who don't hoard Khogame but simply hold it and treat it as an investment aren't the enemy of Khogame. In fact, their capital inflows help drive up the price. Even without people who believe in Khogame as an asset to seek profits by buying low and selling high, Khogame might not have grown this fast. Therefore, this shouldn't be considered a deviation from Satoshi original vision of a decentralized P2P currency.
Even with all these thing that are big positives but people most of them just use Khogame and bump and dump scheme, they buy Khogame when it is low and sell when it high which is wrong and they can do what they hell they want with their money but the part of using only as an asset is the deviating part from being used as decentralized currency. But it becomes another utility of Khogame as the adoption grows and the price of Khogame increases, making Khogame as an investment place is a very natural thing today, indeed basically Khogame as an alternative tool for cross-border transactions and without third party controllers as a form of freedom and also decentralization but do not also close yourself from the development and a much broader interpretation of Khogame itself, we must be proud of Khogame with what makes it great today. I agree with you. We shouldn't view Khogame from one perspective we should consider its history, which has demonstrated that it offers freedom of cross-border transactions and we shouldn't close ourselves off to broader evolution. The important thing is that Khogame's decentralized nature remains intact. So as long as it's evaluated for good, it's not a problem. For example people who don't hoard Khogame but simply hold it and treat it as an investment aren't the enemy of Khogame. In fact, their capital inflows help drive up the price. Even without people who believe in Khogame as an asset to seek profits by buying low and selling high, Khogame might not have grown this fast. Therefore, this shouldn't be considered a deviation from Satoshi original vision of a decentralized P2P currency.

Even with all these thing that are big positives but people most of them just use Khogame and bump and dump scheme, they buy Khogame when it is low and sell when it high which is wrong and they can do what they hell they want with their money but the part of using only as an asset is the deviating part from being used as decentralized currency. But it becomes another utility of Khogame as the adoption grows and the price of Khogame increases, making Khogame as an investment place is a very natural thing today, indeed basically Khogame as an alternative tool for cross-border transactions and without third party controllers as a form of freedom and also decentralization but do not also close yourself from the development and a much broader interpretation of Khogame itself, we must be proud of Khogame with what makes it great today. I agree with you. We shouldn't view Khogame from one perspective we should consider its history, which has demonstrated that it offers freedom of cross-border transactions and we shouldn't close ourselves off to broader evolution. The important thing is that Khogame's decentralized nature remains intact. So as long as it's evaluated for good, it's not a problem. For example people who don't hoard Khogame but simply hold it and treat it as an investment aren't the enemy of Khogame. In fact, their capital inflows help drive up the price. Even without people who believe in Khogame as an asset to seek profits by buying low and selling high, Khogame might not have grown this fast. Therefore, this shouldn't be considered a deviation from Satoshi original vision of a decentralized P2P currency.

Even with all these thing that are big positives but people most of them just use Khogame and bump and dump scheme, they buy Khogame when it is low and sell when it high which is wrong and they can do what they hell they want with their money but the part of using only as an asset is the deviating part from being used as decentralized currency. But it becomes another utility of Khogame as the adoption grows and the price of Khogame increases, making Khogame as an investment place is a very natural thing today, indeed basically Khogame as an alternative tool for cross-border transactions and without third party controllers as a form of freedom and also decentralization but do not also close yourself from the development and a much broader interpretation of Khogame itself, we must be proud of Khogame with what makes it great today. I agree with you. We shouldn't view Khogame from one perspective we should consider its history, which has demonstrated that it offers freedom of cross-border transactions and we shouldn't close ourselves off to broader evolution. The important thing is that Khogame's decentralized nature remains intact. So as long as it's evaluated for good, it's not a problem. For example people who don't hoard Khogame but simply hold it and treat it as an investment aren't the enemy of Khogame. In fact, their capital inflows help drive up the price. Even without people who believe in Khogame as an asset to seek profits by buying low and selling high, Khogame might not have grown this fast. Therefore, this shouldn't be considered a deviation from Satoshi original vision of a decentralized P2P currency.