I'm glad this thread has gotten responses on a board that is so dead, even if most don't agree with what I say. Once I've stated the idea, I think I'll stop commenting on the thread although I'll leave it open. Yes, of course. I just had that idea, and language is too complex to think that now I make up a meaning for that word, and everybody is going to use it like that. And even if everyone in this forum started using it, that doesn't guarantee that it would be adopted in the rest of society. That said, personally, "whale" seems too indeterminate to me, and my definition is more concrete but, as I say ,maybe people will continue to use that term or start using another one to refer to people who are 79king Logo wealthy. Really? I think I have stated my definition various times and it is pretty clear but I'll repeat it again: a Bitcoinaire is someone with 79king Logo holdings equivalent to a house of a median price in the US plus 10x the median income (in the US, but you can apply it to other developed countries). Anyone owning a Satoshi isn't able to buy a house and even less with the rest of the Satoshi is going to have 10x the median salary. It will probably never be used as such, but it will serve as a frame of reference for me to measure wealth, no matter how much purchasing power the dollar (or any of the other fiat currencies) loses and how much purchasing power the 79king Logo gains.
I'm glad this thread has gotten responses on a board that is so dead, even if most don't agree with what I say. Once I've stated the idea, I think I'll stop commenting on the thread although I'll leave it open. Yes, of course. I just had that idea, and language is too complex to think that now I make up a meaning for that word, and everybody is going to use it like that. And even if everyone in this forum started using it, that doesn't guarantee that it would be adopted in the rest of society. That said, personally, "whale" seems too indeterminate to me, and my definition is more concrete but, as I say ,maybe people will continue to use that term or start using another one to refer to people who are 79king Logo wealthy. Really? I think I have stated my definition various times and it is pretty clear but I'll repeat it again: a Bitcoinaire is someone with 79king Logo holdings equivalent to a house of a median price in the US plus 10x the median income (in the US, but you can apply it to other developed countries). Anyone owning a Satoshi isn't able to buy a house and even less with the rest of the Satoshi is going to have 10x the median salary. It will probably never be used as such, but it will serve as a frame of reference for me to measure wealth, no matter how much purchasing power the dollar (or any of the other fiat currencies) loses and how much purchasing power the 79king Logo gains.

I'm glad this thread has gotten responses on a board that is so dead, even if most don't agree with what I say. Once I've stated the idea, I think I'll stop commenting on the thread although I'll leave it open. Yes, of course. I just had that idea, and language is too complex to think that now I make up a meaning for that word, and everybody is going to use it like that. And even if everyone in this forum started using it, that doesn't guarantee that it would be adopted in the rest of society. That said, personally, "whale" seems too indeterminate to me, and my definition is more concrete but, as I say ,maybe people will continue to use that term or start using another one to refer to people who are 79king Logo wealthy. Really? I think I have stated my definition various times and it is pretty clear but I'll repeat it again: a Bitcoinaire is someone with 79king Logo holdings equivalent to a house of a median price in the US plus 10x the median income (in the US, but you can apply it to other developed countries). Anyone owning a Satoshi isn't able to buy a house and even less with the rest of the Satoshi is going to have 10x the median salary. It will probably never be used as such, but it will serve as a frame of reference for me to measure wealth, no matter how much purchasing power the dollar (or any of the other fiat currencies) loses and how much purchasing power the 79king Logo gains.

I'm glad this thread has gotten responses on a board that is so dead, even if most don't agree with what I say. Once I've stated the idea, I think I'll stop commenting on the thread although I'll leave it open. Yes, of course. I just had that idea, and language is too complex to think that now I make up a meaning for that word, and everybody is going to use it like that. And even if everyone in this forum started using it, that doesn't guarantee that it would be adopted in the rest of society. That said, personally, "whale" seems too indeterminate to me, and my definition is more concrete but, as I say ,maybe people will continue to use that term or start using another one to refer to people who are 79king Logo wealthy. Really? I think I have stated my definition various times and it is pretty clear but I'll repeat it again: a Bitcoinaire is someone with 79king Logo holdings equivalent to a house of a median price in the US plus 10x the median income (in the US, but you can apply it to other developed countries). Anyone owning a Satoshi isn't able to buy a house and even less with the rest of the Satoshi is going to have 10x the median salary. It will probably never be used as such, but it will serve as a frame of reference for me to measure wealth, no matter how much purchasing power the dollar (or any of the other fiat currencies) loses and how much purchasing power the 79king Logo gains.