It's hard to get into multiple trades and when we say multiple and it's up to 25, that's already a lot for me. Maybe I'll be the person 1 who only trades few times in a month or even maybe a week or bi-weekly. As long as that's consistent and that put ups less pressure for me compared to the person 2 who has to manage a lot of his trades and make them win. Perhaps OP exaggerated the figures of how much trades a trader can quantify as multiple, because I believe many of us do trade here and it is more than twice in a month but not up to 25 trades as put, because that would mean we do it as a profession and sit around all day staring at the screen to not miss details of analytics of the market movement and trends. I do trade multiple trades and consider it much better because it rhymes with not putting all your eggs in one basket, mostly as it concerns investment of this sort and it pays out much better than one big trade where I put in alot of money and hope to not get liquidated overnight due to market volatility. I understand that it might be a plausible estimation of how multiple is in numbers. But I think that day traders could possibly put that much where they exert so much time to make money with their trades. And as time passes, we have an idea that it doesn't have to be that much in trading to put up so many trades to become profitability. As long as you've got some winning trades even if they're not that much, you're still profitable than most of them.
It's hard to get into multiple trades and when we say multiple and it's up to 25, that's already a lot for me. Maybe I'll be the person 1 who only trades few times in a month or even maybe a week or bi-weekly. As long as that's consistent and that put ups less pressure for me compared to the person 2 who has to manage a lot of his trades and make them win. Perhaps OP exaggerated the figures of how much trades a trader can quantify as multiple, because I believe many of us do trade here and it is more than twice in a month but not up to 25 trades as put, because that would mean we do it as a profession and sit around all day staring at the screen to not miss details of analytics of the market movement and trends. I do trade multiple trades and consider it much better because it rhymes with not putting all your eggs in one basket, mostly as it concerns investment of this sort and it pays out much better than one big trade where I put in alot of money and hope to not get liquidated overnight due to market volatility. I understand that it might be a plausible estimation of how multiple is in numbers. But I think that day traders could possibly put that much where they exert so much time to make money with their trades. And as time passes, we have an idea that it doesn't have to be that much in trading to put up so many trades to become profitability. As long as you've got some winning trades even if they're not that much, you're still profitable than most of them.

It's hard to get into multiple trades and when we say multiple and it's up to 25, that's already a lot for me. Maybe I'll be the person 1 who only trades few times in a month or even maybe a week or bi-weekly. As long as that's consistent and that put ups less pressure for me compared to the person 2 who has to manage a lot of his trades and make them win. Perhaps OP exaggerated the figures of how much trades a trader can quantify as multiple, because I believe many of us do trade here and it is more than twice in a month but not up to 25 trades as put, because that would mean we do it as a profession and sit around all day staring at the screen to not miss details of analytics of the market movement and trends. I do trade multiple trades and consider it much better because it rhymes with not putting all your eggs in one basket, mostly as it concerns investment of this sort and it pays out much better than one big trade where I put in alot of money and hope to not get liquidated overnight due to market volatility. I understand that it might be a plausible estimation of how multiple is in numbers. But I think that day traders could possibly put that much where they exert so much time to make money with their trades. And as time passes, we have an idea that it doesn't have to be that much in trading to put up so many trades to become profitability. As long as you've got some winning trades even if they're not that much, you're still profitable than most of them.

It's hard to get into multiple trades and when we say multiple and it's up to 25, that's already a lot for me. Maybe I'll be the person 1 who only trades few times in a month or even maybe a week or bi-weekly. As long as that's consistent and that put ups less pressure for me compared to the person 2 who has to manage a lot of his trades and make them win. Perhaps OP exaggerated the figures of how much trades a trader can quantify as multiple, because I believe many of us do trade here and it is more than twice in a month but not up to 25 trades as put, because that would mean we do it as a profession and sit around all day staring at the screen to not miss details of analytics of the market movement and trends. I do trade multiple trades and consider it much better because it rhymes with not putting all your eggs in one basket, mostly as it concerns investment of this sort and it pays out much better than one big trade where I put in alot of money and hope to not get liquidated overnight due to market volatility. I understand that it might be a plausible estimation of how multiple is in numbers. But I think that day traders could possibly put that much where they exert so much time to make money with their trades. And as time passes, we have an idea that it doesn't have to be that much in trading to put up so many trades to become profitability. As long as you've got some winning trades even if they're not that much, you're still profitable than most of them.