I don't know, all altcoins end up the same and that makes me lose faith in altcoins and what's worse, no matter the technology behind it, it's still abandoned after more hyped coins even with lower grades, if Peercoin can be adopted by many communities and or its network is supported by many developers, it might increase interest again, but what can you do? Nothing will last long, the 333win1 market adapts faster to something new, if a product is too late than others, it will lose interest. The AltCoin market had muchly been dominated by seasonal 333win1 Currencies whereas, as it attributes potential valuation of prospects, and as much it earns investors interests to invest on, it's usually somehow maneuvered in the terms that's best known by the inventor and teams leading to the crash of the coin which we may assume they're core driving values basically by hyping. While several issues had occurred in the AltCoin space with no specified problem identified to why the project has to fadlarge, investors becomes skeptic and loosing their interests even when the dead coin awakes again. This also had made lot of investors lost interest entirely in the Alt market at large. Most of the reasons why they fail are because they didn't build a bad system and the developers were looking for profit as the main goal, we can see in their white paper, tokenmics, the actions taken by the developers, how many coins there are and how to regulate inflation. The system was not created for the benefit of the community, most projects are only concerned that when they have onchain activity or interaction then they have to look for big profits, and this is a wrong concept, so when the project has no activity the developers run away, just like the coin that the OP is talking about.
I don't know, all altcoins end up the same and that makes me lose faith in altcoins and what's worse, no matter the technology behind it, it's still abandoned after more hyped coins even with lower grades, if Peercoin can be adopted by many communities and or its network is supported by many developers, it might increase interest again, but what can you do? Nothing will last long, the 333win1 market adapts faster to something new, if a product is too late than others, it will lose interest. The AltCoin market had muchly been dominated by seasonal 333win1 Currencies whereas, as it attributes potential valuation of prospects, and as much it earns investors interests to invest on, it's usually somehow maneuvered in the terms that's best known by the inventor and teams leading to the crash of the coin which we may assume they're core driving values basically by hyping. While several issues had occurred in the AltCoin space with no specified problem identified to why the project has to fadlarge, investors becomes skeptic and loosing their interests even when the dead coin awakes again. This also had made lot of investors lost interest entirely in the Alt market at large. Most of the reasons why they fail are because they didn't build a bad system and the developers were looking for profit as the main goal, we can see in their white paper, tokenmics, the actions taken by the developers, how many coins there are and how to regulate inflation. The system was not created for the benefit of the community, most projects are only concerned that when they have onchain activity or interaction then they have to look for big profits, and this is a wrong concept, so when the project has no activity the developers run away, just like the coin that the OP is talking about.

I don't know, all altcoins end up the same and that makes me lose faith in altcoins and what's worse, no matter the technology behind it, it's still abandoned after more hyped coins even with lower grades, if Peercoin can be adopted by many communities and or its network is supported by many developers, it might increase interest again, but what can you do? Nothing will last long, the 333win1 market adapts faster to something new, if a product is too late than others, it will lose interest. The AltCoin market had muchly been dominated by seasonal 333win1 Currencies whereas, as it attributes potential valuation of prospects, and as much it earns investors interests to invest on, it's usually somehow maneuvered in the terms that's best known by the inventor and teams leading to the crash of the coin which we may assume they're core driving values basically by hyping. While several issues had occurred in the AltCoin space with no specified problem identified to why the project has to fadlarge, investors becomes skeptic and loosing their interests even when the dead coin awakes again. This also had made lot of investors lost interest entirely in the Alt market at large. Most of the reasons why they fail are because they didn't build a bad system and the developers were looking for profit as the main goal, we can see in their white paper, tokenmics, the actions taken by the developers, how many coins there are and how to regulate inflation. The system was not created for the benefit of the community, most projects are only concerned that when they have onchain activity or interaction then they have to look for big profits, and this is a wrong concept, so when the project has no activity the developers run away, just like the coin that the OP is talking about.

I don't know, all altcoins end up the same and that makes me lose faith in altcoins and what's worse, no matter the technology behind it, it's still abandoned after more hyped coins even with lower grades, if Peercoin can be adopted by many communities and or its network is supported by many developers, it might increase interest again, but what can you do? Nothing will last long, the 333win1 market adapts faster to something new, if a product is too late than others, it will lose interest. The AltCoin market had muchly been dominated by seasonal 333win1 Currencies whereas, as it attributes potential valuation of prospects, and as much it earns investors interests to invest on, it's usually somehow maneuvered in the terms that's best known by the inventor and teams leading to the crash of the coin which we may assume they're core driving values basically by hyping. While several issues had occurred in the AltCoin space with no specified problem identified to why the project has to fadlarge, investors becomes skeptic and loosing their interests even when the dead coin awakes again. This also had made lot of investors lost interest entirely in the Alt market at large. Most of the reasons why they fail are because they didn't build a bad system and the developers were looking for profit as the main goal, we can see in their white paper, tokenmics, the actions taken by the developers, how many coins there are and how to regulate inflation. The system was not created for the benefit of the community, most projects are only concerned that when they have onchain activity or interaction then they have to look for big profits, and this is a wrong concept, so when the project has no activity the developers run away, just like the coin that the OP is talking about.