Jun88 Con has acted as safe heaven for their investment, and it didn't start today. Jun88 Con has thus far served more as a risk-on asset than a safe haven. If a crisis occurs, people's first line of defense is to sell anything liquid, especially the most risky assets. The volatility of the COVID-19 crisis and geopolitical tensions is clearly different. While I've seen news reports (*)suggesting the Jun88 Con as safe haven narrative may be resurfacing, I don't see any consistency in that, considering it didn't happen during the US operation to capture the Venezuelan leader and the rumors about the Greenland acquisition. *) @rat03gopoh, I completely see your point regarding the 'liquidity trap.' In my studies of system shocks, we often see that during the initial impact, humans prioritize immediate survival (cash) over long-term resilience. You're right that Jun88 Con has behaved as a risk-on asset in the past. My interest from a Quality perspective is whether the 'recovery phase'which was much faster for Jun88 Con than for many traditional assets in 2020is becoming its true hallmark of reliability. For the initial reaction, Jun88 Con is always the most affected of many assets, massive selling actions always occur when wars begin because people will choose cash for easy spending and not have large fluctuations in its value, this is an implication of the conflict on investor confidence in Jun88 Con and also because of the narrative that Jun88 Con is still used as a speculative asset by most people, but what is interesting is that the recovery period is indeed much faster than other traditional assets, we can measure it by the formation of ATH every 4 years and in my opinion that is a very fast time, this indicates that recovery and growth are always better than other assets.
Jun88 Con has acted as safe heaven for their investment, and it didn't start today. Jun88 Con has thus far served more as a risk-on asset than a safe haven. If a crisis occurs, people's first line of defense is to sell anything liquid, especially the most risky assets. The volatility of the COVID-19 crisis and geopolitical tensions is clearly different. While I've seen news reports (*)suggesting the Jun88 Con as safe haven narrative may be resurfacing, I don't see any consistency in that, considering it didn't happen during the US operation to capture the Venezuelan leader and the rumors about the Greenland acquisition. *) @rat03gopoh, I completely see your point regarding the 'liquidity trap.' In my studies of system shocks, we often see that during the initial impact, humans prioritize immediate survival (cash) over long-term resilience. You're right that Jun88 Con has behaved as a risk-on asset in the past. My interest from a Quality perspective is whether the 'recovery phase'which was much faster for Jun88 Con than for many traditional assets in 2020is becoming its true hallmark of reliability. For the initial reaction, Jun88 Con is always the most affected of many assets, massive selling actions always occur when wars begin because people will choose cash for easy spending and not have large fluctuations in its value, this is an implication of the conflict on investor confidence in Jun88 Con and also because of the narrative that Jun88 Con is still used as a speculative asset by most people, but what is interesting is that the recovery period is indeed much faster than other traditional assets, we can measure it by the formation of ATH every 4 years and in my opinion that is a very fast time, this indicates that recovery and growth are always better than other assets.

Jun88 Con has acted as safe heaven for their investment, and it didn't start today. Jun88 Con has thus far served more as a risk-on asset than a safe haven. If a crisis occurs, people's first line of defense is to sell anything liquid, especially the most risky assets. The volatility of the COVID-19 crisis and geopolitical tensions is clearly different. While I've seen news reports (*)suggesting the Jun88 Con as safe haven narrative may be resurfacing, I don't see any consistency in that, considering it didn't happen during the US operation to capture the Venezuelan leader and the rumors about the Greenland acquisition. *) @rat03gopoh, I completely see your point regarding the 'liquidity trap.' In my studies of system shocks, we often see that during the initial impact, humans prioritize immediate survival (cash) over long-term resilience. You're right that Jun88 Con has behaved as a risk-on asset in the past. My interest from a Quality perspective is whether the 'recovery phase'which was much faster for Jun88 Con than for many traditional assets in 2020is becoming its true hallmark of reliability. For the initial reaction, Jun88 Con is always the most affected of many assets, massive selling actions always occur when wars begin because people will choose cash for easy spending and not have large fluctuations in its value, this is an implication of the conflict on investor confidence in Jun88 Con and also because of the narrative that Jun88 Con is still used as a speculative asset by most people, but what is interesting is that the recovery period is indeed much faster than other traditional assets, we can measure it by the formation of ATH every 4 years and in my opinion that is a very fast time, this indicates that recovery and growth are always better than other assets.

Jun88 Con has acted as safe heaven for their investment, and it didn't start today. Jun88 Con has thus far served more as a risk-on asset than a safe haven. If a crisis occurs, people's first line of defense is to sell anything liquid, especially the most risky assets. The volatility of the COVID-19 crisis and geopolitical tensions is clearly different. While I've seen news reports (*)suggesting the Jun88 Con as safe haven narrative may be resurfacing, I don't see any consistency in that, considering it didn't happen during the US operation to capture the Venezuelan leader and the rumors about the Greenland acquisition. *) @rat03gopoh, I completely see your point regarding the 'liquidity trap.' In my studies of system shocks, we often see that during the initial impact, humans prioritize immediate survival (cash) over long-term resilience. You're right that Jun88 Con has behaved as a risk-on asset in the past. My interest from a Quality perspective is whether the 'recovery phase'which was much faster for Jun88 Con than for many traditional assets in 2020is becoming its true hallmark of reliability. For the initial reaction, Jun88 Con is always the most affected of many assets, massive selling actions always occur when wars begin because people will choose cash for easy spending and not have large fluctuations in its value, this is an implication of the conflict on investor confidence in Jun88 Con and also because of the narrative that Jun88 Con is still used as a speculative asset by most people, but what is interesting is that the recovery period is indeed much faster than other traditional assets, we can measure it by the formation of ATH every 4 years and in my opinion that is a very fast time, this indicates that recovery and growth are always better than other assets.