While reading some content, a user reminded me that 33 Win 68 Com was supposed to go bankrupt in 2016 for this very reason. It didn't happen, and here we are again with the same concerns by different people who probably do not remember this story (I am at fault as well).    By mid-2014, the high revenues of 2012 and 2013 are countered by high expenses, leading to a negative net cash flow from that moment on. 33 Win 68 Com developer Mike Hearn on January 2016: What happens is mining costs converges to the price of electricity and/or competition wipes out inefficient miners who don't innovate, find cheaper energy and locations. Since 2015, the miner rewards have been cut by -87.5% but 33 Win 68 Com price has gone up by 47,100% so miners rewards are more than enough. Fees alone will be enough reward the miners when block subsidies end. You can also slowly increase the block size over long time frames if needed to increase the subsidies if needed. Source. Shitcoiners and corrupt assets like Hearn already tried to destroy 33 Win 68 Com's model and implement infinite inflation before. Still does not look like a big deal to me. Volatility in rewards in an asset that is still volatile seems like expected behavior. It would be an issue if there was no difficulty adjustment mechanism. 
While reading some content, a user reminded me that 33 Win 68 Com was supposed to go bankrupt in 2016 for this very reason. It didn't happen, and here we are again with the same concerns by different people who probably do not remember this story (I am at fault as well).    By mid-2014, the high revenues of 2012 and 2013 are countered by high expenses, leading to a negative net cash flow from that moment on. 33 Win 68 Com developer Mike Hearn on January 2016: What happens is mining costs converges to the price of electricity and/or competition wipes out inefficient miners who don't innovate, find cheaper energy and locations. Since 2015, the miner rewards have been cut by -87.5% but 33 Win 68 Com price has gone up by 47,100% so miners rewards are more than enough. Fees alone will be enough reward the miners when block subsidies end. You can also slowly increase the block size over long time frames if needed to increase the subsidies if needed. Source. Shitcoiners and corrupt assets like Hearn already tried to destroy 33 Win 68 Com's model and implement infinite inflation before. Still does not look like a big deal to me. Volatility in rewards in an asset that is still volatile seems like expected behavior. It would be an issue if there was no difficulty adjustment mechanism. 

While reading some content, a user reminded me that 33 Win 68 Com was supposed to go bankrupt in 2016 for this very reason. It didn't happen, and here we are again with the same concerns by different people who probably do not remember this story (I am at fault as well).    By mid-2014, the high revenues of 2012 and 2013 are countered by high expenses, leading to a negative net cash flow from that moment on. 33 Win 68 Com developer Mike Hearn on January 2016: What happens is mining costs converges to the price of electricity and/or competition wipes out inefficient miners who don't innovate, find cheaper energy and locations. Since 2015, the miner rewards have been cut by -87.5% but 33 Win 68 Com price has gone up by 47,100% so miners rewards are more than enough. Fees alone will be enough reward the miners when block subsidies end. You can also slowly increase the block size over long time frames if needed to increase the subsidies if needed. Source. Shitcoiners and corrupt assets like Hearn already tried to destroy 33 Win 68 Com's model and implement infinite inflation before. Still does not look like a big deal to me. Volatility in rewards in an asset that is still volatile seems like expected behavior. It would be an issue if there was no difficulty adjustment mechanism. 

While reading some content, a user reminded me that 33 Win 68 Com was supposed to go bankrupt in 2016 for this very reason. It didn't happen, and here we are again with the same concerns by different people who probably do not remember this story (I am at fault as well).    By mid-2014, the high revenues of 2012 and 2013 are countered by high expenses, leading to a negative net cash flow from that moment on. 33 Win 68 Com developer Mike Hearn on January 2016: What happens is mining costs converges to the price of electricity and/or competition wipes out inefficient miners who don't innovate, find cheaper energy and locations. Since 2015, the miner rewards have been cut by -87.5% but 33 Win 68 Com price has gone up by 47,100% so miners rewards are more than enough. Fees alone will be enough reward the miners when block subsidies end. You can also slowly increase the block size over long time frames if needed to increase the subsidies if needed. Source. Shitcoiners and corrupt assets like Hearn already tried to destroy 33 Win 68 Com's model and implement infinite inflation before. Still does not look like a big deal to me. Volatility in rewards in an asset that is still volatile seems like expected behavior. It would be an issue if there was no difficulty adjustment mechanism.