I think multipolarity narative emerge and strengthened due to western double standards where some action gets different reaction, we can take example, Rusia invasion to Ukraina, they give label as aggression, unlawful and occupation, but When US attack Iraq, they claim it as intervention and for world security order. Many country especially with traumatic colonialism see unipolar with single hegemon as new colonialism. With this political, psychological and ideological foundation which shaped across generations, many country see China, Rusia and non western power as an alternative for no colonialism and domination from non western country feels more acceptable. Thus they forget history that multipolar create more chaos and live in unipolar world they enjoy cheaper stability, security and room for development, mater of fact many country have faster growth in unipolar era. As a matter of fact sometimes many country prefer emotional story about morality than geopolitical reality which showing that national interest is eternal where powerful country dominated and exploited developing and poor country. The most terrible thing, many politic, economy and military elite see multipolarity as opportunity for negotiation room. With many power, elite can play and practicing art of diplomacy to each powerful country. I think, this circumstance is transition symptom that bring long term regional instability and tension will be a normal news. In Multipolar world global institution will loose its role and legitimation and we should worry about rule of play, at that stage gold and silver can only be strategic survival tools not absolute solution, because in the world of multipolar, the most benefiting party is elite, citizen will only be policy object and will bear geopolitical risk. The main solution is adaptation i/o revolution.
I think multipolarity narative emerge and strengthened due to western double standards where some action gets different reaction, we can take example, Rusia invasion to Ukraina, they give label as aggression, unlawful and occupation, but When US attack Iraq, they claim it as intervention and for world security order. Many country especially with traumatic colonialism see unipolar with single hegemon as new colonialism. With this political, psychological and ideological foundation which shaped across generations, many country see China, Rusia and non western power as an alternative for no colonialism and domination from non western country feels more acceptable. Thus they forget history that multipolar create more chaos and live in unipolar world they enjoy cheaper stability, security and room for development, mater of fact many country have faster growth in unipolar era. As a matter of fact sometimes many country prefer emotional story about morality than geopolitical reality which showing that national interest is eternal where powerful country dominated and exploited developing and poor country. The most terrible thing, many politic, economy and military elite see multipolarity as opportunity for negotiation room. With many power, elite can play and practicing art of diplomacy to each powerful country. I think, this circumstance is transition symptom that bring long term regional instability and tension will be a normal news. In Multipolar world global institution will loose its role and legitimation and we should worry about rule of play, at that stage gold and silver can only be strategic survival tools not absolute solution, because in the world of multipolar, the most benefiting party is elite, citizen will only be policy object and will bear geopolitical risk. The main solution is adaptation i/o revolution.

I think multipolarity narative emerge and strengthened due to western double standards where some action gets different reaction, we can take example, Rusia invasion to Ukraina, they give label as aggression, unlawful and occupation, but When US attack Iraq, they claim it as intervention and for world security order. Many country especially with traumatic colonialism see unipolar with single hegemon as new colonialism. With this political, psychological and ideological foundation which shaped across generations, many country see China, Rusia and non western power as an alternative for no colonialism and domination from non western country feels more acceptable. Thus they forget history that multipolar create more chaos and live in unipolar world they enjoy cheaper stability, security and room for development, mater of fact many country have faster growth in unipolar era. As a matter of fact sometimes many country prefer emotional story about morality than geopolitical reality which showing that national interest is eternal where powerful country dominated and exploited developing and poor country. The most terrible thing, many politic, economy and military elite see multipolarity as opportunity for negotiation room. With many power, elite can play and practicing art of diplomacy to each powerful country. I think, this circumstance is transition symptom that bring long term regional instability and tension will be a normal news. In Multipolar world global institution will loose its role and legitimation and we should worry about rule of play, at that stage gold and silver can only be strategic survival tools not absolute solution, because in the world of multipolar, the most benefiting party is elite, citizen will only be policy object and will bear geopolitical risk. The main solution is adaptation i/o revolution.

I think multipolarity narative emerge and strengthened due to western double standards where some action gets different reaction, we can take example, Rusia invasion to Ukraina, they give label as aggression, unlawful and occupation, but When US attack Iraq, they claim it as intervention and for world security order. Many country especially with traumatic colonialism see unipolar with single hegemon as new colonialism. With this political, psychological and ideological foundation which shaped across generations, many country see China, Rusia and non western power as an alternative for no colonialism and domination from non western country feels more acceptable. Thus they forget history that multipolar create more chaos and live in unipolar world they enjoy cheaper stability, security and room for development, mater of fact many country have faster growth in unipolar era. As a matter of fact sometimes many country prefer emotional story about morality than geopolitical reality which showing that national interest is eternal where powerful country dominated and exploited developing and poor country. The most terrible thing, many politic, economy and military elite see multipolarity as opportunity for negotiation room. With many power, elite can play and practicing art of diplomacy to each powerful country. I think, this circumstance is transition symptom that bring long term regional instability and tension will be a normal news. In Multipolar world global institution will loose its role and legitimation and we should worry about rule of play, at that stage gold and silver can only be strategic survival tools not absolute solution, because in the world of multipolar, the most benefiting party is elite, citizen will only be policy object and will bear geopolitical risk. The main solution is adaptation i/o revolution.