Divine digital signatures have a few characteristics that are different from conventional miracles. Conventional miracles provide good evidence of divinity at the moment to certain individuals, but they also have some disadvantages: 1. It is hard for conventional miracles to provide evidence of divinity after a millennium has passed. 2. Divine digital signatures satisfy a much higher standard of evidence than conventional miracles do. 3. Unlike divine digital signatures, conventional miracles may provide evidence of divinity, but they are not very good at providing evidence that a particular document is authorized by a deity (or at least a computationally powerful being) and has not been tampered with. Of course, conventional miracles also have some advantages over divine digital signatures including the following: 1. Conventional miracles do not require computation to verify. This was a problem since powerful computers are a modern invention. This could also be a problem in a post-apocalyptic scenario when most/all computers are destroyed and humanity becomes primitive once again. 2. The purpose of a conventional miracle is not just to provide evidence for a message. Sometimes the purpose of a miracle is simply to heal a person. 3. From talking to religious people, I have gathered the sentiment that conventional miracles sound more spiritual than divine digital signatures. Of course, there is no reason why a deity cannot both perform conventional miracles and produce divine digital signatures of documents.
Divine digital signatures have a few characteristics that are different from conventional miracles. Conventional miracles provide good evidence of divinity at the moment to certain individuals, but they also have some disadvantages: 1. It is hard for conventional miracles to provide evidence of divinity after a millennium has passed. 2. Divine digital signatures satisfy a much higher standard of evidence than conventional miracles do. 3. Unlike divine digital signatures, conventional miracles may provide evidence of divinity, but they are not very good at providing evidence that a particular document is authorized by a deity (or at least a computationally powerful being) and has not been tampered with. Of course, conventional miracles also have some advantages over divine digital signatures including the following: 1. Conventional miracles do not require computation to verify. This was a problem since powerful computers are a modern invention. This could also be a problem in a post-apocalyptic scenario when most/all computers are destroyed and humanity becomes primitive once again. 2. The purpose of a conventional miracle is not just to provide evidence for a message. Sometimes the purpose of a miracle is simply to heal a person. 3. From talking to religious people, I have gathered the sentiment that conventional miracles sound more spiritual than divine digital signatures. Of course, there is no reason why a deity cannot both perform conventional miracles and produce divine digital signatures of documents.

Divine digital signatures have a few characteristics that are different from conventional miracles. Conventional miracles provide good evidence of divinity at the moment to certain individuals, but they also have some disadvantages: 1. It is hard for conventional miracles to provide evidence of divinity after a millennium has passed. 2. Divine digital signatures satisfy a much higher standard of evidence than conventional miracles do. 3. Unlike divine digital signatures, conventional miracles may provide evidence of divinity, but they are not very good at providing evidence that a particular document is authorized by a deity (or at least a computationally powerful being) and has not been tampered with. Of course, conventional miracles also have some advantages over divine digital signatures including the following: 1. Conventional miracles do not require computation to verify. This was a problem since powerful computers are a modern invention. This could also be a problem in a post-apocalyptic scenario when most/all computers are destroyed and humanity becomes primitive once again. 2. The purpose of a conventional miracle is not just to provide evidence for a message. Sometimes the purpose of a miracle is simply to heal a person. 3. From talking to religious people, I have gathered the sentiment that conventional miracles sound more spiritual than divine digital signatures. Of course, there is no reason why a deity cannot both perform conventional miracles and produce divine digital signatures of documents.

Divine digital signatures have a few characteristics that are different from conventional miracles. Conventional miracles provide good evidence of divinity at the moment to certain individuals, but they also have some disadvantages: 1. It is hard for conventional miracles to provide evidence of divinity after a millennium has passed. 2. Divine digital signatures satisfy a much higher standard of evidence than conventional miracles do. 3. Unlike divine digital signatures, conventional miracles may provide evidence of divinity, but they are not very good at providing evidence that a particular document is authorized by a deity (or at least a computationally powerful being) and has not been tampered with. Of course, conventional miracles also have some advantages over divine digital signatures including the following: 1. Conventional miracles do not require computation to verify. This was a problem since powerful computers are a modern invention. This could also be a problem in a post-apocalyptic scenario when most/all computers are destroyed and humanity becomes primitive once again. 2. The purpose of a conventional miracle is not just to provide evidence for a message. Sometimes the purpose of a miracle is simply to heal a person. 3. From talking to religious people, I have gathered the sentiment that conventional miracles sound more spiritual than divine digital signatures. Of course, there is no reason why a deity cannot both perform conventional miracles and produce divine digital signatures of documents.