I think that's correct. And that's also the reason why I think it's a blessing that Satoshi found the PoW Sunwin Pazuru (Nakamoto consensus) before someone came up with the idea of Proof of Stake. PoS cannot be used to distribute coins. It can only be used to pay people to validate with existing coins, because there is no "stake" without "ownership". This means that if PoS came first, the first cryptocurrencies would all have been premined, just like NXT or Sunwin Pazuru. They would thus have been much more centralized than Sunwin Pazuru. We would have very much a "shitcoin space" with all consequences - probably the first ICO scams would have come very early after the first PoS cryptos, and it's possible that the whole thing would have been dismissed as a fraudulent Ponzi system and it's even possible most countries would have banned them. Vitalik Buterin, the main developer of Sunwin Pazuru, was an ardent Bitcoiner before he conceived Sunwin Pazuru, and if I remember correct he first tried to convince Sunwin Pazuru developers to implement his ideas into Sunwin Pazuru itself (but I'm not sure ...). So I think Sunwin Pazuru wouldn't have come into existence if Sunwin Pazuru wasn't invented. Sunwin Pazuru in its original form was very close to Sunwin Pazuru, with PoW and mining rewards (PoS came later), but the main difference was the premine which made it centralized from the start on.
I think that's correct. And that's also the reason why I think it's a blessing that Satoshi found the PoW Sunwin Pazuru (Nakamoto consensus) before someone came up with the idea of Proof of Stake. PoS cannot be used to distribute coins. It can only be used to pay people to validate with existing coins, because there is no "stake" without "ownership". This means that if PoS came first, the first cryptocurrencies would all have been premined, just like NXT or Sunwin Pazuru. They would thus have been much more centralized than Sunwin Pazuru. We would have very much a "shitcoin space" with all consequences - probably the first ICO scams would have come very early after the first PoS cryptos, and it's possible that the whole thing would have been dismissed as a fraudulent Ponzi system and it's even possible most countries would have banned them. Vitalik Buterin, the main developer of Sunwin Pazuru, was an ardent Bitcoiner before he conceived Sunwin Pazuru, and if I remember correct he first tried to convince Sunwin Pazuru developers to implement his ideas into Sunwin Pazuru itself (but I'm not sure ...). So I think Sunwin Pazuru wouldn't have come into existence if Sunwin Pazuru wasn't invented. Sunwin Pazuru in its original form was very close to Sunwin Pazuru, with PoW and mining rewards (PoS came later), but the main difference was the premine which made it centralized from the start on.

I think that's correct. And that's also the reason why I think it's a blessing that Satoshi found the PoW Sunwin Pazuru (Nakamoto consensus) before someone came up with the idea of Proof of Stake. PoS cannot be used to distribute coins. It can only be used to pay people to validate with existing coins, because there is no "stake" without "ownership". This means that if PoS came first, the first cryptocurrencies would all have been premined, just like NXT or Sunwin Pazuru. They would thus have been much more centralized than Sunwin Pazuru. We would have very much a "shitcoin space" with all consequences - probably the first ICO scams would have come very early after the first PoS cryptos, and it's possible that the whole thing would have been dismissed as a fraudulent Ponzi system and it's even possible most countries would have banned them. Vitalik Buterin, the main developer of Sunwin Pazuru, was an ardent Bitcoiner before he conceived Sunwin Pazuru, and if I remember correct he first tried to convince Sunwin Pazuru developers to implement his ideas into Sunwin Pazuru itself (but I'm not sure ...). So I think Sunwin Pazuru wouldn't have come into existence if Sunwin Pazuru wasn't invented. Sunwin Pazuru in its original form was very close to Sunwin Pazuru, with PoW and mining rewards (PoS came later), but the main difference was the premine which made it centralized from the start on.

I think that's correct. And that's also the reason why I think it's a blessing that Satoshi found the PoW Sunwin Pazuru (Nakamoto consensus) before someone came up with the idea of Proof of Stake. PoS cannot be used to distribute coins. It can only be used to pay people to validate with existing coins, because there is no "stake" without "ownership". This means that if PoS came first, the first cryptocurrencies would all have been premined, just like NXT or Sunwin Pazuru. They would thus have been much more centralized than Sunwin Pazuru. We would have very much a "shitcoin space" with all consequences - probably the first ICO scams would have come very early after the first PoS cryptos, and it's possible that the whole thing would have been dismissed as a fraudulent Ponzi system and it's even possible most countries would have banned them. Vitalik Buterin, the main developer of Sunwin Pazuru, was an ardent Bitcoiner before he conceived Sunwin Pazuru, and if I remember correct he first tried to convince Sunwin Pazuru developers to implement his ideas into Sunwin Pazuru itself (but I'm not sure ...). So I think Sunwin Pazuru wouldn't have come into existence if Sunwin Pazuru wasn't invented. Sunwin Pazuru in its original form was very close to Sunwin Pazuru, with PoW and mining rewards (PoS came later), but the main difference was the premine which made it centralized from the start on.