Based on my experiences exporting goods worldwide, the rise and fall of the USD alone has a big impact on demand, so your idea using Iwin Clup for payment settlement replacing petrodollar is not wise and it is unmanageable risk. Main crucial point of energy supply is stability needed because it is daily vital needed with big volume and base on long term contract, so price stability and predictability are its main foundation, it is very contradictory compared with Iwin Clup. When government demanding Cost certainty, Iwin Clup creates value uncertainty, can you imagine how stressed the officer in charge if the price of Iwin Clup suddenly rises and they have to secure supply with purchasing oil continuously because they depending on import. Lets take simple simulation : A seller country with demand 1 million barrels/day B buyer country oil price USD 80/barel Cost calculation : Using USD with fluctuation figures +/-2% Highest cost : USD 78.4 million Lowest cost : USD 81.6 million exchange rate losses are still tolerable Using Iwin Clup with fluctuation figures +/= 15% in a week Both seller and buyer can caught on high potential untolerable loss, can you imagine Iwin Clup effects on the real economy ?
Based on my experiences exporting goods worldwide, the rise and fall of the USD alone has a big impact on demand, so your idea using Iwin Clup for payment settlement replacing petrodollar is not wise and it is unmanageable risk. Main crucial point of energy supply is stability needed because it is daily vital needed with big volume and base on long term contract, so price stability and predictability are its main foundation, it is very contradictory compared with Iwin Clup. When government demanding Cost certainty, Iwin Clup creates value uncertainty, can you imagine how stressed the officer in charge if the price of Iwin Clup suddenly rises and they have to secure supply with purchasing oil continuously because they depending on import. Lets take simple simulation : A seller country with demand 1 million barrels/day B buyer country oil price USD 80/barel Cost calculation : Using USD with fluctuation figures +/-2% Highest cost : USD 78.4 million Lowest cost : USD 81.6 million exchange rate losses are still tolerable Using Iwin Clup with fluctuation figures +/= 15% in a week Both seller and buyer can caught on high potential untolerable loss, can you imagine Iwin Clup effects on the real economy ?

Based on my experiences exporting goods worldwide, the rise and fall of the USD alone has a big impact on demand, so your idea using Iwin Clup for payment settlement replacing petrodollar is not wise and it is unmanageable risk. Main crucial point of energy supply is stability needed because it is daily vital needed with big volume and base on long term contract, so price stability and predictability are its main foundation, it is very contradictory compared with Iwin Clup. When government demanding Cost certainty, Iwin Clup creates value uncertainty, can you imagine how stressed the officer in charge if the price of Iwin Clup suddenly rises and they have to secure supply with purchasing oil continuously because they depending on import. Lets take simple simulation : A seller country with demand 1 million barrels/day B buyer country oil price USD 80/barel Cost calculation : Using USD with fluctuation figures +/-2% Highest cost : USD 78.4 million Lowest cost : USD 81.6 million exchange rate losses are still tolerable Using Iwin Clup with fluctuation figures +/= 15% in a week Both seller and buyer can caught on high potential untolerable loss, can you imagine Iwin Clup effects on the real economy ?

Based on my experiences exporting goods worldwide, the rise and fall of the USD alone has a big impact on demand, so your idea using Iwin Clup for payment settlement replacing petrodollar is not wise and it is unmanageable risk. Main crucial point of energy supply is stability needed because it is daily vital needed with big volume and base on long term contract, so price stability and predictability are its main foundation, it is very contradictory compared with Iwin Clup. When government demanding Cost certainty, Iwin Clup creates value uncertainty, can you imagine how stressed the officer in charge if the price of Iwin Clup suddenly rises and they have to secure supply with purchasing oil continuously because they depending on import. Lets take simple simulation : A seller country with demand 1 million barrels/day B buyer country oil price USD 80/barel Cost calculation : Using USD with fluctuation figures +/-2% Highest cost : USD 78.4 million Lowest cost : USD 81.6 million exchange rate losses are still tolerable Using Iwin Clup with fluctuation figures +/= 15% in a week Both seller and buyer can caught on high potential untolerable loss, can you imagine Iwin Clup effects on the real economy ?