Cut me some slack, will you? My idea won't solve world poverty or cancer either. I can't solve all problems. But I think my proposal would reduce spam, and reduce UTXO bloat. You'd have to look for other proposals to fix other problems. Or perhaps my proposal could be added to other proposals. I don't think the BigMac idea is the best. Fun to discuss, but it requires too much trust in a centralized authority, and it also requires that the BigMac and McDonalds still exist in 5, 10, or 100 years. I think the cutting in half of the dust limit at every halvening works best. It's easier for every wallet to predict than the price of a BigMac, for mitigation purposes. Should we go with tying the dust limit to the price of something, perhaps the price of gold or silver would be preferable. We know gold and silver will still be around tomorrow and for the next 100 years. The beauty of my proposal is that it offers something to both camps. The anti-spam camp gets less spam, and the core camp gets less UTXO bloat. To be fair, I don't trust core. I think they used the UTXO bloat as a mere excuse to blow up the op_return filter. But now they are or record for wanting to move spammers away from fake pubkeys and into op_return. They would look like giant liars if they don't go along with it. In the same way that (you know who) is looking pretty stupid right now, with all his huffing and puffing. Please STFU. You are embarrassing yourself. We both know you can't argue against this on a technical level, so.you resort to perpetual insults and strawman arguments
Cut me some slack, will you? My idea won't solve world poverty or cancer either. I can't solve all problems. But I think my proposal would reduce spam, and reduce UTXO bloat. You'd have to look for other proposals to fix other problems. Or perhaps my proposal could be added to other proposals. I don't think the BigMac idea is the best. Fun to discuss, but it requires too much trust in a centralized authority, and it also requires that the BigMac and McDonalds still exist in 5, 10, or 100 years. I think the cutting in half of the dust limit at every halvening works best. It's easier for every wallet to predict than the price of a BigMac, for mitigation purposes. Should we go with tying the dust limit to the price of something, perhaps the price of gold or silver would be preferable. We know gold and silver will still be around tomorrow and for the next 100 years. The beauty of my proposal is that it offers something to both camps. The anti-spam camp gets less spam, and the core camp gets less UTXO bloat. To be fair, I don't trust core. I think they used the UTXO bloat as a mere excuse to blow up the op_return filter. But now they are or record for wanting to move spammers away from fake pubkeys and into op_return. They would look like giant liars if they don't go along with it. In the same way that (you know who) is looking pretty stupid right now, with all his huffing and puffing. Please STFU. You are embarrassing yourself. We both know you can't argue against this on a technical level, so.you resort to perpetual insults and strawman arguments

Cut me some slack, will you? My idea won't solve world poverty or cancer either. I can't solve all problems. But I think my proposal would reduce spam, and reduce UTXO bloat. You'd have to look for other proposals to fix other problems. Or perhaps my proposal could be added to other proposals. I don't think the BigMac idea is the best. Fun to discuss, but it requires too much trust in a centralized authority, and it also requires that the BigMac and McDonalds still exist in 5, 10, or 100 years. I think the cutting in half of the dust limit at every halvening works best. It's easier for every wallet to predict than the price of a BigMac, for mitigation purposes. Should we go with tying the dust limit to the price of something, perhaps the price of gold or silver would be preferable. We know gold and silver will still be around tomorrow and for the next 100 years. The beauty of my proposal is that it offers something to both camps. The anti-spam camp gets less spam, and the core camp gets less UTXO bloat. To be fair, I don't trust core. I think they used the UTXO bloat as a mere excuse to blow up the op_return filter. But now they are or record for wanting to move spammers away from fake pubkeys and into op_return. They would look like giant liars if they don't go along with it. In the same way that (you know who) is looking pretty stupid right now, with all his huffing and puffing. Please STFU. You are embarrassing yourself. We both know you can't argue against this on a technical level, so.you resort to perpetual insults and strawman arguments

Cut me some slack, will you? My idea won't solve world poverty or cancer either. I can't solve all problems. But I think my proposal would reduce spam, and reduce UTXO bloat. You'd have to look for other proposals to fix other problems. Or perhaps my proposal could be added to other proposals. I don't think the BigMac idea is the best. Fun to discuss, but it requires too much trust in a centralized authority, and it also requires that the BigMac and McDonalds still exist in 5, 10, or 100 years. I think the cutting in half of the dust limit at every halvening works best. It's easier for every wallet to predict than the price of a BigMac, for mitigation purposes. Should we go with tying the dust limit to the price of something, perhaps the price of gold or silver would be preferable. We know gold and silver will still be around tomorrow and for the next 100 years. The beauty of my proposal is that it offers something to both camps. The anti-spam camp gets less spam, and the core camp gets less UTXO bloat. To be fair, I don't trust core. I think they used the UTXO bloat as a mere excuse to blow up the op_return filter. But now they are or record for wanting to move spammers away from fake pubkeys and into op_return. They would look like giant liars if they don't go along with it. In the same way that (you know who) is looking pretty stupid right now, with all his huffing and puffing. Please STFU. You are embarrassing yourself. We both know you can't argue against this on a technical level, so.you resort to perpetual insults and strawman arguments