It is not limited to Yahoo, journalism has experienced an extreme loss of quality in the past decades. Who is at fault with this, the chicken or the egg? If serious articles no longer get as much views and clicks as some sensational bullshit, who should we blame more? The one that is fulfilling the demand or the one that is demanding that bullshit? I expect that they have fairly decent data on these things and that it is the main reason why quantity and sensationalism is served over quality content. It is one of the easiest jobs. Sure, but it is just a reflection of the average person in society. How many people do you know that are not biased on a daily basis? How many of them are not biased when they are extremely upset? You probably do not know a single person, and at best know one or two examples if you are lucky. Mainstream media won't stop being biased until people stop being biased and until it becomes forbidden to manipulate the story based on who is financing you. As long as both of these things are happening there is no chance for this to become very different. Never forget that in the democratic charm, these idiots can always outvote you and lead everyone else to ruin. Ruins. Just ruins to any nation that such people dictate their affairs (as the majority) in any subdivision. Somehow, they've been able to blend in that charisma to whomever wants to get their shit stuffed up in their head. Good lord, in 2026? We need a better system where there is accountability and in which the majority of the stupid does not dictate the rules to everyone else. Everything would start changing for the better in such an environment.
It is not limited to Yahoo, journalism has experienced an extreme loss of quality in the past decades. Who is at fault with this, the chicken or the egg? If serious articles no longer get as much views and clicks as some sensational bullshit, who should we blame more? The one that is fulfilling the demand or the one that is demanding that bullshit? I expect that they have fairly decent data on these things and that it is the main reason why quantity and sensationalism is served over quality content. It is one of the easiest jobs. Sure, but it is just a reflection of the average person in society. How many people do you know that are not biased on a daily basis? How many of them are not biased when they are extremely upset? You probably do not know a single person, and at best know one or two examples if you are lucky. Mainstream media won't stop being biased until people stop being biased and until it becomes forbidden to manipulate the story based on who is financing you. As long as both of these things are happening there is no chance for this to become very different. Never forget that in the democratic charm, these idiots can always outvote you and lead everyone else to ruin. Ruins. Just ruins to any nation that such people dictate their affairs (as the majority) in any subdivision. Somehow, they've been able to blend in that charisma to whomever wants to get their shit stuffed up in their head. Good lord, in 2026? We need a better system where there is accountability and in which the majority of the stupid does not dictate the rules to everyone else. Everything would start changing for the better in such an environment.

It is not limited to Yahoo, journalism has experienced an extreme loss of quality in the past decades. Who is at fault with this, the chicken or the egg? If serious articles no longer get as much views and clicks as some sensational bullshit, who should we blame more? The one that is fulfilling the demand or the one that is demanding that bullshit? I expect that they have fairly decent data on these things and that it is the main reason why quantity and sensationalism is served over quality content. It is one of the easiest jobs. Sure, but it is just a reflection of the average person in society. How many people do you know that are not biased on a daily basis? How many of them are not biased when they are extremely upset? You probably do not know a single person, and at best know one or two examples if you are lucky. Mainstream media won't stop being biased until people stop being biased and until it becomes forbidden to manipulate the story based on who is financing you. As long as both of these things are happening there is no chance for this to become very different. Never forget that in the democratic charm, these idiots can always outvote you and lead everyone else to ruin. Ruins. Just ruins to any nation that such people dictate their affairs (as the majority) in any subdivision. Somehow, they've been able to blend in that charisma to whomever wants to get their shit stuffed up in their head. Good lord, in 2026? We need a better system where there is accountability and in which the majority of the stupid does not dictate the rules to everyone else. Everything would start changing for the better in such an environment.

It is not limited to Yahoo, journalism has experienced an extreme loss of quality in the past decades. Who is at fault with this, the chicken or the egg? If serious articles no longer get as much views and clicks as some sensational bullshit, who should we blame more? The one that is fulfilling the demand or the one that is demanding that bullshit? I expect that they have fairly decent data on these things and that it is the main reason why quantity and sensationalism is served over quality content. It is one of the easiest jobs. Sure, but it is just a reflection of the average person in society. How many people do you know that are not biased on a daily basis? How many of them are not biased when they are extremely upset? You probably do not know a single person, and at best know one or two examples if you are lucky. Mainstream media won't stop being biased until people stop being biased and until it becomes forbidden to manipulate the story based on who is financing you. As long as both of these things are happening there is no chance for this to become very different. Never forget that in the democratic charm, these idiots can always outvote you and lead everyone else to ruin. Ruins. Just ruins to any nation that such people dictate their affairs (as the majority) in any subdivision. Somehow, they've been able to blend in that charisma to whomever wants to get their shit stuffed up in their head. Good lord, in 2026? We need a better system where there is accountability and in which the majority of the stupid does not dictate the rules to everyone else. Everything would start changing for the better in such an environment.