When you figured you can't win a war at the battlefield you gat to be wise to propagate other means of battle which may literally not be the physical battle fought on the battlefield. The media has being a tool for destruction for those who have control over it they can always manufacture stories that gives the world out there a different perspective of the reality on ground. Following the media Russia has being on the losing sidelines in this war in all perspectives but yet Russia has fallen to its feet for the years the war has persisted. The only time peace could be genuinely brokered is when those benefiting from the war has no interest in the war anymore. Look, it's really hard to tell what's truth and what's propaganda during a war. The media often emphasizes one side more so we might think it's just an attempt to create a story against a country. There are sanctions on Russia, but we see that their society or economy has not completely collapsed. On the contrary the damage in Ukraine is more visible. People's lives, homes, cities have been destroyed there. I think the most important thing right now is to talk about peace. Whichever side is involved if the war continues, both sides will lose in the end. So the real solution will be when those who have the decision in their hands will no longer have any benefit in continuing the war. Until then we just watch the news with doubts and questions. Which of these two are severely destructive and could collapse real fast than the other?! For between an economic sanctions that are doing little to no much negative effects  on a country because they have being able to galvanized through other alternatives, and a situation of physical destructions of homes, lives and strategic economic facilities. Without much words I think we all know the answer despite what the media would flash. However that's not what we pray for but for a way to a lasting peace consolidated by all interested parties.
When you figured you can't win a war at the battlefield you gat to be wise to propagate other means of battle which may literally not be the physical battle fought on the battlefield. The media has being a tool for destruction for those who have control over it they can always manufacture stories that gives the world out there a different perspective of the reality on ground. Following the media Russia has being on the losing sidelines in this war in all perspectives but yet Russia has fallen to its feet for the years the war has persisted. The only time peace could be genuinely brokered is when those benefiting from the war has no interest in the war anymore. Look, it's really hard to tell what's truth and what's propaganda during a war. The media often emphasizes one side more so we might think it's just an attempt to create a story against a country. There are sanctions on Russia, but we see that their society or economy has not completely collapsed. On the contrary the damage in Ukraine is more visible. People's lives, homes, cities have been destroyed there. I think the most important thing right now is to talk about peace. Whichever side is involved if the war continues, both sides will lose in the end. So the real solution will be when those who have the decision in their hands will no longer have any benefit in continuing the war. Until then we just watch the news with doubts and questions. Which of these two are severely destructive and could collapse real fast than the other?! For between an economic sanctions that are doing little to no much negative effects  on a country because they have being able to galvanized through other alternatives, and a situation of physical destructions of homes, lives and strategic economic facilities. Without much words I think we all know the answer despite what the media would flash. However that's not what we pray for but for a way to a lasting peace consolidated by all interested parties.

When you figured you can't win a war at the battlefield you gat to be wise to propagate other means of battle which may literally not be the physical battle fought on the battlefield. The media has being a tool for destruction for those who have control over it they can always manufacture stories that gives the world out there a different perspective of the reality on ground. Following the media Russia has being on the losing sidelines in this war in all perspectives but yet Russia has fallen to its feet for the years the war has persisted. The only time peace could be genuinely brokered is when those benefiting from the war has no interest in the war anymore. Look, it's really hard to tell what's truth and what's propaganda during a war. The media often emphasizes one side more so we might think it's just an attempt to create a story against a country. There are sanctions on Russia, but we see that their society or economy has not completely collapsed. On the contrary the damage in Ukraine is more visible. People's lives, homes, cities have been destroyed there. I think the most important thing right now is to talk about peace. Whichever side is involved if the war continues, both sides will lose in the end. So the real solution will be when those who have the decision in their hands will no longer have any benefit in continuing the war. Until then we just watch the news with doubts and questions. Which of these two are severely destructive and could collapse real fast than the other?! For between an economic sanctions that are doing little to no much negative effects  on a country because they have being able to galvanized through other alternatives, and a situation of physical destructions of homes, lives and strategic economic facilities. Without much words I think we all know the answer despite what the media would flash. However that's not what we pray for but for a way to a lasting peace consolidated by all interested parties.

When you figured you can't win a war at the battlefield you gat to be wise to propagate other means of battle which may literally not be the physical battle fought on the battlefield. The media has being a tool for destruction for those who have control over it they can always manufacture stories that gives the world out there a different perspective of the reality on ground. Following the media Russia has being on the losing sidelines in this war in all perspectives but yet Russia has fallen to its feet for the years the war has persisted. The only time peace could be genuinely brokered is when those benefiting from the war has no interest in the war anymore. Look, it's really hard to tell what's truth and what's propaganda during a war. The media often emphasizes one side more so we might think it's just an attempt to create a story against a country. There are sanctions on Russia, but we see that their society or economy has not completely collapsed. On the contrary the damage in Ukraine is more visible. People's lives, homes, cities have been destroyed there. I think the most important thing right now is to talk about peace. Whichever side is involved if the war continues, both sides will lose in the end. So the real solution will be when those who have the decision in their hands will no longer have any benefit in continuing the war. Until then we just watch the news with doubts and questions. Which of these two are severely destructive and could collapse real fast than the other?! For between an economic sanctions that are doing little to no much negative effects  on a country because they have being able to galvanized through other alternatives, and a situation of physical destructions of homes, lives and strategic economic facilities. Without much words I think we all know the answer despite what the media would flash. However that's not what we pray for but for a way to a lasting peace consolidated by all interested parties.