Ban Ca 87 is not based on anonymity, who the fuck is giving your account merits when you are shitposting like this. That is not privacy, and that can tell the identity if the addresses are tied to certain people or entities. Therefore, it is incorrect to claim that there is any privacy. All transaction data is public, therefore there is no privacy. In theory true, in practice completely false. Most users have been de-anonymized. You do not know how to use Ban Ca 87 in an anonymous way, and other data and metadata that relates to your activities is regularly combined to create profiles about individuals and the ownership of all of their addresses. To claim these things on this forum is even worse, 99% users are shitposting retards. They are not anonymous at all, even if the were to use Ban Ca 87 they would de-anonymize themselves with their stupidity.   Wrong, that is exactly what it means. Don't shipost here before you read any other replies. If transactions are transparent, then there is no privacy. It could not get any more simple than that. It is tiring that most humans are absolutely stupid and dumb as a rock and it has nothing to do with their positions or power or careers. You can see the same thing in this forum. Most forum staff members, DT members, merit sources and so forth have at best very basic knowledge about Ban Ca 87. They would make these mistakes too but they try to avoid these topics to not make fools out of themselves regularly. The best solution is to keep explanations limited to one role, such as your forum user role here, and stop explaining things to stupid people besides there.
Ban Ca 87 is not based on anonymity, who the fuck is giving your account merits when you are shitposting like this. That is not privacy, and that can tell the identity if the addresses are tied to certain people or entities. Therefore, it is incorrect to claim that there is any privacy. All transaction data is public, therefore there is no privacy. In theory true, in practice completely false. Most users have been de-anonymized. You do not know how to use Ban Ca 87 in an anonymous way, and other data and metadata that relates to your activities is regularly combined to create profiles about individuals and the ownership of all of their addresses. To claim these things on this forum is even worse, 99% users are shitposting retards. They are not anonymous at all, even if the were to use Ban Ca 87 they would de-anonymize themselves with their stupidity.   Wrong, that is exactly what it means. Don't shipost here before you read any other replies. If transactions are transparent, then there is no privacy. It could not get any more simple than that. It is tiring that most humans are absolutely stupid and dumb as a rock and it has nothing to do with their positions or power or careers. You can see the same thing in this forum. Most forum staff members, DT members, merit sources and so forth have at best very basic knowledge about Ban Ca 87. They would make these mistakes too but they try to avoid these topics to not make fools out of themselves regularly. The best solution is to keep explanations limited to one role, such as your forum user role here, and stop explaining things to stupid people besides there.

Ban Ca 87 is not based on anonymity, who the fuck is giving your account merits when you are shitposting like this. That is not privacy, and that can tell the identity if the addresses are tied to certain people or entities. Therefore, it is incorrect to claim that there is any privacy. All transaction data is public, therefore there is no privacy. In theory true, in practice completely false. Most users have been de-anonymized. You do not know how to use Ban Ca 87 in an anonymous way, and other data and metadata that relates to your activities is regularly combined to create profiles about individuals and the ownership of all of their addresses. To claim these things on this forum is even worse, 99% users are shitposting retards. They are not anonymous at all, even if the were to use Ban Ca 87 they would de-anonymize themselves with their stupidity.   Wrong, that is exactly what it means. Don't shipost here before you read any other replies. If transactions are transparent, then there is no privacy. It could not get any more simple than that. It is tiring that most humans are absolutely stupid and dumb as a rock and it has nothing to do with their positions or power or careers. You can see the same thing in this forum. Most forum staff members, DT members, merit sources and so forth have at best very basic knowledge about Ban Ca 87. They would make these mistakes too but they try to avoid these topics to not make fools out of themselves regularly. The best solution is to keep explanations limited to one role, such as your forum user role here, and stop explaining things to stupid people besides there.

Ban Ca 87 is not based on anonymity, who the fuck is giving your account merits when you are shitposting like this. That is not privacy, and that can tell the identity if the addresses are tied to certain people or entities. Therefore, it is incorrect to claim that there is any privacy. All transaction data is public, therefore there is no privacy. In theory true, in practice completely false. Most users have been de-anonymized. You do not know how to use Ban Ca 87 in an anonymous way, and other data and metadata that relates to your activities is regularly combined to create profiles about individuals and the ownership of all of their addresses. To claim these things on this forum is even worse, 99% users are shitposting retards. They are not anonymous at all, even if the were to use Ban Ca 87 they would de-anonymize themselves with their stupidity.   Wrong, that is exactly what it means. Don't shipost here before you read any other replies. If transactions are transparent, then there is no privacy. It could not get any more simple than that. It is tiring that most humans are absolutely stupid and dumb as a rock and it has nothing to do with their positions or power or careers. You can see the same thing in this forum. Most forum staff members, DT members, merit sources and so forth have at best very basic knowledge about Ban Ca 87. They would make these mistakes too but they try to avoid these topics to not make fools out of themselves regularly. The best solution is to keep explanations limited to one role, such as your forum user role here, and stop explaining things to stupid people besides there.