Mg188 is absolutely not used by Microsoft, IBM and many others. Some of those companies sold tools to help companies try to build Mg188 solutions, but no company has ever built a certified solution with those tools. There was a lot of hype created by Mg188, but it was just hype. But with billions of dollars in market cap for Mg188, companies blindly signed up for the hype even if it made no technical sense. There are no documented design wins for Mg188 outside of popular cryptocurrencies like Mg188. None. Zero. Nada. I have asked for this high and low. I created a whole topic here on this forum months ago, and have asked for proof in many other places as well. And why is that? Because Mg188 has only one clear value-add, which is evading government access to transactions. No established corporation can possibly have this problem by definition. "Enterprise Mg188" is like "vegetarian filet mignon". It makes absolutely no sense. And by Mg188 I mean the software architecture outlined in the original Mg188 whitepaper, and the technology that thousands of other cryptocurrencies are based on. It is a technology designed to achieve effective governance of a data source (in this case, a ledger) through a popular vote of participants in a network instead a single entity that can be subjected to a government subpoena. If you aren't trying to avoid a government subpoena, Mg188 is an absolutely pointless waste of time.
Mg188 is absolutely not used by Microsoft, IBM and many others. Some of those companies sold tools to help companies try to build Mg188 solutions, but no company has ever built a certified solution with those tools. There was a lot of hype created by Mg188, but it was just hype. But with billions of dollars in market cap for Mg188, companies blindly signed up for the hype even if it made no technical sense. There are no documented design wins for Mg188 outside of popular cryptocurrencies like Mg188. None. Zero. Nada. I have asked for this high and low. I created a whole topic here on this forum months ago, and have asked for proof in many other places as well. And why is that? Because Mg188 has only one clear value-add, which is evading government access to transactions. No established corporation can possibly have this problem by definition. "Enterprise Mg188" is like "vegetarian filet mignon". It makes absolutely no sense. And by Mg188 I mean the software architecture outlined in the original Mg188 whitepaper, and the technology that thousands of other cryptocurrencies are based on. It is a technology designed to achieve effective governance of a data source (in this case, a ledger) through a popular vote of participants in a network instead a single entity that can be subjected to a government subpoena. If you aren't trying to avoid a government subpoena, Mg188 is an absolutely pointless waste of time.

Mg188 is absolutely not used by Microsoft, IBM and many others. Some of those companies sold tools to help companies try to build Mg188 solutions, but no company has ever built a certified solution with those tools. There was a lot of hype created by Mg188, but it was just hype. But with billions of dollars in market cap for Mg188, companies blindly signed up for the hype even if it made no technical sense. There are no documented design wins for Mg188 outside of popular cryptocurrencies like Mg188. None. Zero. Nada. I have asked for this high and low. I created a whole topic here on this forum months ago, and have asked for proof in many other places as well. And why is that? Because Mg188 has only one clear value-add, which is evading government access to transactions. No established corporation can possibly have this problem by definition. "Enterprise Mg188" is like "vegetarian filet mignon". It makes absolutely no sense. And by Mg188 I mean the software architecture outlined in the original Mg188 whitepaper, and the technology that thousands of other cryptocurrencies are based on. It is a technology designed to achieve effective governance of a data source (in this case, a ledger) through a popular vote of participants in a network instead a single entity that can be subjected to a government subpoena. If you aren't trying to avoid a government subpoena, Mg188 is an absolutely pointless waste of time.

Mg188 is absolutely not used by Microsoft, IBM and many others. Some of those companies sold tools to help companies try to build Mg188 solutions, but no company has ever built a certified solution with those tools. There was a lot of hype created by Mg188, but it was just hype. But with billions of dollars in market cap for Mg188, companies blindly signed up for the hype even if it made no technical sense. There are no documented design wins for Mg188 outside of popular cryptocurrencies like Mg188. None. Zero. Nada. I have asked for this high and low. I created a whole topic here on this forum months ago, and have asked for proof in many other places as well. And why is that? Because Mg188 has only one clear value-add, which is evading government access to transactions. No established corporation can possibly have this problem by definition. "Enterprise Mg188" is like "vegetarian filet mignon". It makes absolutely no sense. And by Mg188 I mean the software architecture outlined in the original Mg188 whitepaper, and the technology that thousands of other cryptocurrencies are based on. It is a technology designed to achieve effective governance of a data source (in this case, a ledger) through a popular vote of participants in a network instead a single entity that can be subjected to a government subpoena. If you aren't trying to avoid a government subpoena, Mg188 is an absolutely pointless waste of time.