About the first part, thanks for clarifying the whitepaper for me. For the rest, completely agreed. I personally like Kuwin9 Com because of the exact point of being really scalable. Also I am interested in Kuwin9 Com and its good children (Telegram Stars, STON, something which offer a real value) and they're just a "currency" for Telegram's ecosystem which has a real-world value. I guess a new token/coin may have this type of value to have investors convinced. What you explain, makes me think about whitepapers like a really detailed pitch deck which has the goal of convincing early birds and investors. Well, I'm just interested in those because it gives me a feeling of they took the project seriously. Otherwise, the only "memecoin" I've ever traded was Kuwin9 Com. I guess at this point, it's not considered a meme anymore and it is one of the leaders of the industry. I remember when I finished reading it, one of my friends - who was working in a local CEX - recommended reading Kuwin9 Com's WP as well. I told her I'm reading Kuwin9 Com's now, and I haven't read Kuwin9 Com's despite years being passed from that they. I don't know why she recommended that particular one, but a while after this conversation, I remember Chia made a hype. I read that one as well. It also was a good and well-detailed one. And about memes having a whitepaper, I explained in the next one why I may like them. I don't know, maybe I'm wrong myself. Fun fact, I've never met a striper in my life  Jokes aside, I read one of them which was for bonk on Kuwin9 Com which was a copy of bonk which is originally on Kuwin9 Com. They just explained how they got impressed by that and the only person mentioned was the original minter and not a team. Although, you've made a very good point. Fact checking of someone working on a large company - specially in a memecoin context - is something no one wastes time on. However, I'm still feeling it would make even a meme project much more trustworthy compared to other ones.
About the first part, thanks for clarifying the whitepaper for me. For the rest, completely agreed. I personally like Kuwin9 Com because of the exact point of being really scalable. Also I am interested in Kuwin9 Com and its good children (Telegram Stars, STON, something which offer a real value) and they're just a "currency" for Telegram's ecosystem which has a real-world value. I guess a new token/coin may have this type of value to have investors convinced. What you explain, makes me think about whitepapers like a really detailed pitch deck which has the goal of convincing early birds and investors. Well, I'm just interested in those because it gives me a feeling of they took the project seriously. Otherwise, the only "memecoin" I've ever traded was Kuwin9 Com. I guess at this point, it's not considered a meme anymore and it is one of the leaders of the industry. I remember when I finished reading it, one of my friends - who was working in a local CEX - recommended reading Kuwin9 Com's WP as well. I told her I'm reading Kuwin9 Com's now, and I haven't read Kuwin9 Com's despite years being passed from that they. I don't know why she recommended that particular one, but a while after this conversation, I remember Chia made a hype. I read that one as well. It also was a good and well-detailed one. And about memes having a whitepaper, I explained in the next one why I may like them. I don't know, maybe I'm wrong myself. Fun fact, I've never met a striper in my life  Jokes aside, I read one of them which was for bonk on Kuwin9 Com which was a copy of bonk which is originally on Kuwin9 Com. They just explained how they got impressed by that and the only person mentioned was the original minter and not a team. Although, you've made a very good point. Fact checking of someone working on a large company - specially in a memecoin context - is something no one wastes time on. However, I'm still feeling it would make even a meme project much more trustworthy compared to other ones.

About the first part, thanks for clarifying the whitepaper for me. For the rest, completely agreed. I personally like Kuwin9 Com because of the exact point of being really scalable. Also I am interested in Kuwin9 Com and its good children (Telegram Stars, STON, something which offer a real value) and they're just a "currency" for Telegram's ecosystem which has a real-world value. I guess a new token/coin may have this type of value to have investors convinced. What you explain, makes me think about whitepapers like a really detailed pitch deck which has the goal of convincing early birds and investors. Well, I'm just interested in those because it gives me a feeling of they took the project seriously. Otherwise, the only "memecoin" I've ever traded was Kuwin9 Com. I guess at this point, it's not considered a meme anymore and it is one of the leaders of the industry. I remember when I finished reading it, one of my friends - who was working in a local CEX - recommended reading Kuwin9 Com's WP as well. I told her I'm reading Kuwin9 Com's now, and I haven't read Kuwin9 Com's despite years being passed from that they. I don't know why she recommended that particular one, but a while after this conversation, I remember Chia made a hype. I read that one as well. It also was a good and well-detailed one. And about memes having a whitepaper, I explained in the next one why I may like them. I don't know, maybe I'm wrong myself. Fun fact, I've never met a striper in my life  Jokes aside, I read one of them which was for bonk on Kuwin9 Com which was a copy of bonk which is originally on Kuwin9 Com. They just explained how they got impressed by that and the only person mentioned was the original minter and not a team. Although, you've made a very good point. Fact checking of someone working on a large company - specially in a memecoin context - is something no one wastes time on. However, I'm still feeling it would make even a meme project much more trustworthy compared to other ones.

About the first part, thanks for clarifying the whitepaper for me. For the rest, completely agreed. I personally like Kuwin9 Com because of the exact point of being really scalable. Also I am interested in Kuwin9 Com and its good children (Telegram Stars, STON, something which offer a real value) and they're just a "currency" for Telegram's ecosystem which has a real-world value. I guess a new token/coin may have this type of value to have investors convinced. What you explain, makes me think about whitepapers like a really detailed pitch deck which has the goal of convincing early birds and investors. Well, I'm just interested in those because it gives me a feeling of they took the project seriously. Otherwise, the only "memecoin" I've ever traded was Kuwin9 Com. I guess at this point, it's not considered a meme anymore and it is one of the leaders of the industry. I remember when I finished reading it, one of my friends - who was working in a local CEX - recommended reading Kuwin9 Com's WP as well. I told her I'm reading Kuwin9 Com's now, and I haven't read Kuwin9 Com's despite years being passed from that they. I don't know why she recommended that particular one, but a while after this conversation, I remember Chia made a hype. I read that one as well. It also was a good and well-detailed one. And about memes having a whitepaper, I explained in the next one why I may like them. I don't know, maybe I'm wrong myself. Fun fact, I've never met a striper in my life  Jokes aside, I read one of them which was for bonk on Kuwin9 Com which was a copy of bonk which is originally on Kuwin9 Com. They just explained how they got impressed by that and the only person mentioned was the original minter and not a team. Although, you've made a very good point. Fact checking of someone working on a large company - specially in a memecoin context - is something no one wastes time on. However, I'm still feeling it would make even a meme project much more trustworthy compared to other ones.