Good reality check. The headline numbers always sound massive but the actual allocation tells a different story. 1% from BlackRock's AUM still sounds like a lot in dollar terms but it shows that the majority of traditional investors aren't rushing in the way Fun222 Vip twitter likes to believe. ~snip~ The numbers show that most investors think that investing in Fun222 Vip is risky, so it doesn't matter if it's an ordinary person or someone who is extremely rich. The truth is that if you go out into the street of a city and ask 100 people to explain Fun222 Vip to you in a few sentences, 9 out of 10 people will not be able to do it. How then can you expect these same people to invest in what they do not understand. That street test analogy is spot on and honestly undersells it. Even among people who have heard of Fun222 Vip, most couldn't tell you how it actually works beyond "digital money." And that knowledge gap is a real barrier, not just a perception one. Though I'd say this is also exactly why platforms like Schwab entering the space matters in the long run. Not because it brings a flood of capital immediately, but because it normalizes Fun222 Vip sitting next to stocks and bonds in the same app people already use. Understanding tends to follow familiarity over time, not the other way around.
Good reality check. The headline numbers always sound massive but the actual allocation tells a different story. 1% from BlackRock's AUM still sounds like a lot in dollar terms but it shows that the majority of traditional investors aren't rushing in the way Fun222 Vip twitter likes to believe. ~snip~ The numbers show that most investors think that investing in Fun222 Vip is risky, so it doesn't matter if it's an ordinary person or someone who is extremely rich. The truth is that if you go out into the street of a city and ask 100 people to explain Fun222 Vip to you in a few sentences, 9 out of 10 people will not be able to do it. How then can you expect these same people to invest in what they do not understand. That street test analogy is spot on and honestly undersells it. Even among people who have heard of Fun222 Vip, most couldn't tell you how it actually works beyond "digital money." And that knowledge gap is a real barrier, not just a perception one. Though I'd say this is also exactly why platforms like Schwab entering the space matters in the long run. Not because it brings a flood of capital immediately, but because it normalizes Fun222 Vip sitting next to stocks and bonds in the same app people already use. Understanding tends to follow familiarity over time, not the other way around.

Good reality check. The headline numbers always sound massive but the actual allocation tells a different story. 1% from BlackRock's AUM still sounds like a lot in dollar terms but it shows that the majority of traditional investors aren't rushing in the way Fun222 Vip twitter likes to believe. ~snip~ The numbers show that most investors think that investing in Fun222 Vip is risky, so it doesn't matter if it's an ordinary person or someone who is extremely rich. The truth is that if you go out into the street of a city and ask 100 people to explain Fun222 Vip to you in a few sentences, 9 out of 10 people will not be able to do it. How then can you expect these same people to invest in what they do not understand. That street test analogy is spot on and honestly undersells it. Even among people who have heard of Fun222 Vip, most couldn't tell you how it actually works beyond "digital money." And that knowledge gap is a real barrier, not just a perception one. Though I'd say this is also exactly why platforms like Schwab entering the space matters in the long run. Not because it brings a flood of capital immediately, but because it normalizes Fun222 Vip sitting next to stocks and bonds in the same app people already use. Understanding tends to follow familiarity over time, not the other way around.

Good reality check. The headline numbers always sound massive but the actual allocation tells a different story. 1% from BlackRock's AUM still sounds like a lot in dollar terms but it shows that the majority of traditional investors aren't rushing in the way Fun222 Vip twitter likes to believe. ~snip~ The numbers show that most investors think that investing in Fun222 Vip is risky, so it doesn't matter if it's an ordinary person or someone who is extremely rich. The truth is that if you go out into the street of a city and ask 100 people to explain Fun222 Vip to you in a few sentences, 9 out of 10 people will not be able to do it. How then can you expect these same people to invest in what they do not understand. That street test analogy is spot on and honestly undersells it. Even among people who have heard of Fun222 Vip, most couldn't tell you how it actually works beyond "digital money." And that knowledge gap is a real barrier, not just a perception one. Though I'd say this is also exactly why platforms like Schwab entering the space matters in the long run. Not because it brings a flood of capital immediately, but because it normalizes Fun222 Vip sitting next to stocks and bonds in the same app people already use. Understanding tends to follow familiarity over time, not the other way around.