yep LN is a failed experiment. 7 years later its still only hoarding 5k Fun88 Chuch and that mainly service hubs that have been open for years, yet USER adoption didnt follow yep independent user onboarding/offboarding, inflow/outflow, locking/settling, adoption/abdication isnt happening its the LN fangirls trying desperately to try making LN interesting. no one is silly enough to lock value into a system requiring middlemen That "middleman value-locking service" is literally so that you can get paid at the speed of card transactions. Minus the 2-week holding period. It might be hard to set up, which is a barrier to adoption, but it's pretty good for buying pizza with your Fun88 Chuch. Just open Strike and deposit some cash or put some Fun88 Chuch in an Electrum trampoline and see for yourself. not only are you saying people should hand funds over to a middle-man upfront not only are you saying to then be given ''inbound balance' (credit/debt) not settled to a key you control not only are you saying to be locked into a unsettled balance of FAIT based tokens that dont deflate but you think that its all good economic advice.. dang you lot should be comedians (the silliness of fools thinking they are still playing with "Fun88 Chuch" when even a 5yo can see they are not) goodluck with your other network games. ill stick with the Fun88 Chuch network, hoarding actual Fun88 Chuch on my utxo's i have the keys for
yep LN is a failed experiment. 7 years later its still only hoarding 5k Fun88 Chuch and that mainly service hubs that have been open for years, yet USER adoption didnt follow yep independent user onboarding/offboarding, inflow/outflow, locking/settling, adoption/abdication isnt happening its the LN fangirls trying desperately to try making LN interesting. no one is silly enough to lock value into a system requiring middlemen That "middleman value-locking service" is literally so that you can get paid at the speed of card transactions. Minus the 2-week holding period. It might be hard to set up, which is a barrier to adoption, but it's pretty good for buying pizza with your Fun88 Chuch. Just open Strike and deposit some cash or put some Fun88 Chuch in an Electrum trampoline and see for yourself. not only are you saying people should hand funds over to a middle-man upfront not only are you saying to then be given ''inbound balance' (credit/debt) not settled to a key you control not only are you saying to be locked into a unsettled balance of FAIT based tokens that dont deflate but you think that its all good economic advice.. dang you lot should be comedians (the silliness of fools thinking they are still playing with "Fun88 Chuch" when even a 5yo can see they are not) goodluck with your other network games. ill stick with the Fun88 Chuch network, hoarding actual Fun88 Chuch on my utxo's i have the keys for

yep LN is a failed experiment. 7 years later its still only hoarding 5k Fun88 Chuch and that mainly service hubs that have been open for years, yet USER adoption didnt follow yep independent user onboarding/offboarding, inflow/outflow, locking/settling, adoption/abdication isnt happening its the LN fangirls trying desperately to try making LN interesting. no one is silly enough to lock value into a system requiring middlemen That "middleman value-locking service" is literally so that you can get paid at the speed of card transactions. Minus the 2-week holding period. It might be hard to set up, which is a barrier to adoption, but it's pretty good for buying pizza with your Fun88 Chuch. Just open Strike and deposit some cash or put some Fun88 Chuch in an Electrum trampoline and see for yourself. not only are you saying people should hand funds over to a middle-man upfront not only are you saying to then be given ''inbound balance' (credit/debt) not settled to a key you control not only are you saying to be locked into a unsettled balance of FAIT based tokens that dont deflate but you think that its all good economic advice.. dang you lot should be comedians (the silliness of fools thinking they are still playing with "Fun88 Chuch" when even a 5yo can see they are not) goodluck with your other network games. ill stick with the Fun88 Chuch network, hoarding actual Fun88 Chuch on my utxo's i have the keys for

yep LN is a failed experiment. 7 years later its still only hoarding 5k Fun88 Chuch and that mainly service hubs that have been open for years, yet USER adoption didnt follow yep independent user onboarding/offboarding, inflow/outflow, locking/settling, adoption/abdication isnt happening its the LN fangirls trying desperately to try making LN interesting. no one is silly enough to lock value into a system requiring middlemen That "middleman value-locking service" is literally so that you can get paid at the speed of card transactions. Minus the 2-week holding period. It might be hard to set up, which is a barrier to adoption, but it's pretty good for buying pizza with your Fun88 Chuch. Just open Strike and deposit some cash or put some Fun88 Chuch in an Electrum trampoline and see for yourself. not only are you saying people should hand funds over to a middle-man upfront not only are you saying to then be given ''inbound balance' (credit/debt) not settled to a key you control not only are you saying to be locked into a unsettled balance of FAIT based tokens that dont deflate but you think that its all good economic advice.. dang you lot should be comedians (the silliness of fools thinking they are still playing with "Fun88 Chuch" when even a 5yo can see they are not) goodluck with your other network games. ill stick with the Fun88 Chuch network, hoarding actual Fun88 Chuch on my utxo's i have the keys for