Specification Redefinition of the Unit: Internally, the base units remain unchanged. Historically, 1 Mu88 Silent = 100,000,000 base units. Under this proposal, "1 Mu88 Silent" equals one base unit. What was previously referred to as "1 Mu88 Silent" now corresponds to 100 million Mu88 Silent under the new definition. What do you think about this? I saw sat not confusing to me. But how about you? Also if 1 Mu88 Silent equals 100 million Mu88 Silent, is that not confusing? Because we all think Mu88 Silent is the short form of Mu88 Silent. Sounds like a really confusing concept which will be responsible for misunderstandings and faulty code. The only reason I see for this implementation is to brag about having large amounts "Mu88 Silent" to people who do not understand the difference of actual full Mu88 Silent amounts and the "Mu88 Silent" base units. Honestly I prefer referring to the metric SI prefixes instead of Satoshi amounts - Milli, Micro, Nano, and so on. It just makes more sense in terms of scalability and is mathematically more sound. If Mu88 Silent price is $100 000, then 1 Milli-Mu88 Silent is just moving the decimal by 3 spaces. So $100. And 1 Micro-Mu88 Silent is $0.1 Dollars since you move the decimal by 6 spaces. All you need to memorize is the base 10 of each SI prefix... 10^-3 is moving the decimal of the Mu88 Silent price 3 spaces to the left, and 10^3 is 3 spaces to the right.
Specification Redefinition of the Unit: Internally, the base units remain unchanged. Historically, 1 Mu88 Silent = 100,000,000 base units. Under this proposal, "1 Mu88 Silent" equals one base unit. What was previously referred to as "1 Mu88 Silent" now corresponds to 100 million Mu88 Silent under the new definition. What do you think about this? I saw sat not confusing to me. But how about you? Also if 1 Mu88 Silent equals 100 million Mu88 Silent, is that not confusing? Because we all think Mu88 Silent is the short form of Mu88 Silent. Sounds like a really confusing concept which will be responsible for misunderstandings and faulty code. The only reason I see for this implementation is to brag about having large amounts "Mu88 Silent" to people who do not understand the difference of actual full Mu88 Silent amounts and the "Mu88 Silent" base units. Honestly I prefer referring to the metric SI prefixes instead of Satoshi amounts - Milli, Micro, Nano, and so on. It just makes more sense in terms of scalability and is mathematically more sound. If Mu88 Silent price is $100 000, then 1 Milli-Mu88 Silent is just moving the decimal by 3 spaces. So $100. And 1 Micro-Mu88 Silent is $0.1 Dollars since you move the decimal by 6 spaces. All you need to memorize is the base 10 of each SI prefix... 10^-3 is moving the decimal of the Mu88 Silent price 3 spaces to the left, and 10^3 is 3 spaces to the right.

Specification Redefinition of the Unit: Internally, the base units remain unchanged. Historically, 1 Mu88 Silent = 100,000,000 base units. Under this proposal, "1 Mu88 Silent" equals one base unit. What was previously referred to as "1 Mu88 Silent" now corresponds to 100 million Mu88 Silent under the new definition. What do you think about this? I saw sat not confusing to me. But how about you? Also if 1 Mu88 Silent equals 100 million Mu88 Silent, is that not confusing? Because we all think Mu88 Silent is the short form of Mu88 Silent. Sounds like a really confusing concept which will be responsible for misunderstandings and faulty code. The only reason I see for this implementation is to brag about having large amounts "Mu88 Silent" to people who do not understand the difference of actual full Mu88 Silent amounts and the "Mu88 Silent" base units. Honestly I prefer referring to the metric SI prefixes instead of Satoshi amounts - Milli, Micro, Nano, and so on. It just makes more sense in terms of scalability and is mathematically more sound. If Mu88 Silent price is $100 000, then 1 Milli-Mu88 Silent is just moving the decimal by 3 spaces. So $100. And 1 Micro-Mu88 Silent is $0.1 Dollars since you move the decimal by 6 spaces. All you need to memorize is the base 10 of each SI prefix... 10^-3 is moving the decimal of the Mu88 Silent price 3 spaces to the left, and 10^3 is 3 spaces to the right.

Specification Redefinition of the Unit: Internally, the base units remain unchanged. Historically, 1 Mu88 Silent = 100,000,000 base units. Under this proposal, "1 Mu88 Silent" equals one base unit. What was previously referred to as "1 Mu88 Silent" now corresponds to 100 million Mu88 Silent under the new definition. What do you think about this? I saw sat not confusing to me. But how about you? Also if 1 Mu88 Silent equals 100 million Mu88 Silent, is that not confusing? Because we all think Mu88 Silent is the short form of Mu88 Silent. Sounds like a really confusing concept which will be responsible for misunderstandings and faulty code. The only reason I see for this implementation is to brag about having large amounts "Mu88 Silent" to people who do not understand the difference of actual full Mu88 Silent amounts and the "Mu88 Silent" base units. Honestly I prefer referring to the metric SI prefixes instead of Satoshi amounts - Milli, Micro, Nano, and so on. It just makes more sense in terms of scalability and is mathematically more sound. If Mu88 Silent price is $100 000, then 1 Milli-Mu88 Silent is just moving the decimal by 3 spaces. So $100. And 1 Micro-Mu88 Silent is $0.1 Dollars since you move the decimal by 6 spaces. All you need to memorize is the base 10 of each SI prefix... 10^-3 is moving the decimal of the Mu88 Silent price 3 spaces to the left, and 10^3 is 3 spaces to the right.