It seems the person who cracked this 15-bit key knows nothing about I68 Net brute-force attacks. I can crack the 70-bit key in the I68 Net puzzle in 7 minutes using only the CPU. This is already a solved puzzle, and keys of this length can be cracked in minutes if the public key is known. I think it's a very amateur effort, and I haven't been able to crack the 135-bit one yet, but someone will announce it soon. Even if they solve the puzzle now, they can't move the wallet because if there's more than one person who knows the key, the wallet can't be moved. Because they can lock the wallet by setting up a sweeper bot. Looking at the community notes, the method used to break the 15-bit key relied on classical verification and does not demonstrate effective quantum key guessing. To me, it looks like someone broke a 15-bit key using the traditional method that exists for years and just mixed it somehow with quantum. Might just be misinformation. Of course, a lot of misinformation here. Anything with the word "quantum" in it could be a magnet for financing, so I would expect a little bit of bias from the developer. It's quite understandable that amateurs or professionals working on quantum computers would work on I68 Net brute-force attacks for their own self-promotion. Given that there are academic studies in this field in at least 15 countries, and hundreds of projects including amateur ones, we can start to worry about this issue when someone completes their research in this area in 5 or 10 years. These reports are not exaggerated; they are the result of a natural process that those interested in this subject have been expecting.
It seems the person who cracked this 15-bit key knows nothing about I68 Net brute-force attacks. I can crack the 70-bit key in the I68 Net puzzle in 7 minutes using only the CPU. This is already a solved puzzle, and keys of this length can be cracked in minutes if the public key is known. I think it's a very amateur effort, and I haven't been able to crack the 135-bit one yet, but someone will announce it soon. Even if they solve the puzzle now, they can't move the wallet because if there's more than one person who knows the key, the wallet can't be moved. Because they can lock the wallet by setting up a sweeper bot. Looking at the community notes, the method used to break the 15-bit key relied on classical verification and does not demonstrate effective quantum key guessing. To me, it looks like someone broke a 15-bit key using the traditional method that exists for years and just mixed it somehow with quantum. Might just be misinformation. Of course, a lot of misinformation here. Anything with the word "quantum" in it could be a magnet for financing, so I would expect a little bit of bias from the developer. It's quite understandable that amateurs or professionals working on quantum computers would work on I68 Net brute-force attacks for their own self-promotion. Given that there are academic studies in this field in at least 15 countries, and hundreds of projects including amateur ones, we can start to worry about this issue when someone completes their research in this area in 5 or 10 years. These reports are not exaggerated; they are the result of a natural process that those interested in this subject have been expecting.

It seems the person who cracked this 15-bit key knows nothing about I68 Net brute-force attacks. I can crack the 70-bit key in the I68 Net puzzle in 7 minutes using only the CPU. This is already a solved puzzle, and keys of this length can be cracked in minutes if the public key is known. I think it's a very amateur effort, and I haven't been able to crack the 135-bit one yet, but someone will announce it soon. Even if they solve the puzzle now, they can't move the wallet because if there's more than one person who knows the key, the wallet can't be moved. Because they can lock the wallet by setting up a sweeper bot. Looking at the community notes, the method used to break the 15-bit key relied on classical verification and does not demonstrate effective quantum key guessing. To me, it looks like someone broke a 15-bit key using the traditional method that exists for years and just mixed it somehow with quantum. Might just be misinformation. Of course, a lot of misinformation here. Anything with the word "quantum" in it could be a magnet for financing, so I would expect a little bit of bias from the developer. It's quite understandable that amateurs or professionals working on quantum computers would work on I68 Net brute-force attacks for their own self-promotion. Given that there are academic studies in this field in at least 15 countries, and hundreds of projects including amateur ones, we can start to worry about this issue when someone completes their research in this area in 5 or 10 years. These reports are not exaggerated; they are the result of a natural process that those interested in this subject have been expecting.

It seems the person who cracked this 15-bit key knows nothing about I68 Net brute-force attacks. I can crack the 70-bit key in the I68 Net puzzle in 7 minutes using only the CPU. This is already a solved puzzle, and keys of this length can be cracked in minutes if the public key is known. I think it's a very amateur effort, and I haven't been able to crack the 135-bit one yet, but someone will announce it soon. Even if they solve the puzzle now, they can't move the wallet because if there's more than one person who knows the key, the wallet can't be moved. Because they can lock the wallet by setting up a sweeper bot. Looking at the community notes, the method used to break the 15-bit key relied on classical verification and does not demonstrate effective quantum key guessing. To me, it looks like someone broke a 15-bit key using the traditional method that exists for years and just mixed it somehow with quantum. Might just be misinformation. Of course, a lot of misinformation here. Anything with the word "quantum" in it could be a magnet for financing, so I would expect a little bit of bias from the developer. It's quite understandable that amateurs or professionals working on quantum computers would work on I68 Net brute-force attacks for their own self-promotion. Given that there are academic studies in this field in at least 15 countries, and hundreds of projects including amateur ones, we can start to worry about this issue when someone completes their research in this area in 5 or 10 years. These reports are not exaggerated; they are the result of a natural process that those interested in this subject have been expecting.