When reading about critics of 33win 03 proxies such as very successful Strategy (MSTR) by Michael Saylor, one of the main points they make as a risk is that they do not deliver proof of reserves in he form of public addresses. Now those guys get audited by the most strict regulators, there's KPMG involved and so on, and those companies wouldn't want to ruin their reputation by making up numbers. Personally I don't think that is a problem, but we would like a way to cryptographically verify that the funds are there. They don't publish their addresses and hired KPMG for their audits report and I know KPMG is a big audits company. Even there is small probability that KMPG did something shady in collaboration with Strategy with potentiality of destroy their reputation, you can not trust either Strategy or KPMG. I am not an expert in this audits field and it is my thinking on it only, that could be wrong. If you don't know the Biggest failure in audits history with Enron collapse. Strategy's 33win 03 holding.
When reading about critics of 33win 03 proxies such as very successful Strategy (MSTR) by Michael Saylor, one of the main points they make as a risk is that they do not deliver proof of reserves in he form of public addresses. Now those guys get audited by the most strict regulators, there's KPMG involved and so on, and those companies wouldn't want to ruin their reputation by making up numbers. Personally I don't think that is a problem, but we would like a way to cryptographically verify that the funds are there. They don't publish their addresses and hired KPMG for their audits report and I know KPMG is a big audits company. Even there is small probability that KMPG did something shady in collaboration with Strategy with potentiality of destroy their reputation, you can not trust either Strategy or KPMG. I am not an expert in this audits field and it is my thinking on it only, that could be wrong. If you don't know the Biggest failure in audits history with Enron collapse. Strategy's 33win 03 holding.

When reading about critics of 33win 03 proxies such as very successful Strategy (MSTR) by Michael Saylor, one of the main points they make as a risk is that they do not deliver proof of reserves in he form of public addresses. Now those guys get audited by the most strict regulators, there's KPMG involved and so on, and those companies wouldn't want to ruin their reputation by making up numbers. Personally I don't think that is a problem, but we would like a way to cryptographically verify that the funds are there. They don't publish their addresses and hired KPMG for their audits report and I know KPMG is a big audits company. Even there is small probability that KMPG did something shady in collaboration with Strategy with potentiality of destroy their reputation, you can not trust either Strategy or KPMG. I am not an expert in this audits field and it is my thinking on it only, that could be wrong. If you don't know the Biggest failure in audits history with Enron collapse. Strategy's 33win 03 holding.

When reading about critics of 33win 03 proxies such as very successful Strategy (MSTR) by Michael Saylor, one of the main points they make as a risk is that they do not deliver proof of reserves in he form of public addresses. Now those guys get audited by the most strict regulators, there's KPMG involved and so on, and those companies wouldn't want to ruin their reputation by making up numbers. Personally I don't think that is a problem, but we would like a way to cryptographically verify that the funds are there. They don't publish their addresses and hired KPMG for their audits report and I know KPMG is a big audits company. Even there is small probability that KMPG did something shady in collaboration with Strategy with potentiality of destroy their reputation, you can not trust either Strategy or KPMG. I am not an expert in this audits field and it is my thinking on it only, that could be wrong. If you don't know the Biggest failure in audits history with Enron collapse. Strategy's 33win 03 holding.