I know different opinions and ideas may arise, but I'll be more willing to read and reflect each of it. The system of schooling do not create builders, rather it molds earners, and mind you, salary do not make you rich but makes you survive through the economy. Those that are actually rich, name them, are people that failed out of school, think outside the box and build something unique, because they break out of the cycle and find their way out earlier before their successful certificate mates start looking for jobs as was told earlier. These dropouts saw the trap and bypass it early before their school mates, and so they remain at the top and even employ their mate in their company. The explanation wasn't straight and forward, when we were little, only few kids didn't cry while taken to school, that was a general natural syndrome among kids in my locality, they never wanted to go to school, because of the fun at home, it was all a battle, and parents had to come up with nice good stories around the things children crave for and promise them that after schooling they'll have all that cars, houses, and mansion. It was a promise, and not a lie, people do go to school, graduate, get the job, and live their dream life for a while. Yes it works that way, but like anything else in life, not for everybody. When something like Education is generalized it'll get faulty at the level of distribution and accomplishments. Not all the students are able to offer what they've read in school. It's also true that the school never did well in making everyone a specialist, but some who knew of a course and practices it, had better opportunities when with the right network. In a nutshell, the society should focus more on changing the narratives of schools as a place for immediate riches, to a place for networking and creating value, this will go a long way in diluting the misunderstanding between graduates, schools and parents.
I know different opinions and ideas may arise, but I'll be more willing to read and reflect each of it. The system of schooling do not create builders, rather it molds earners, and mind you, salary do not make you rich but makes you survive through the economy. Those that are actually rich, name them, are people that failed out of school, think outside the box and build something unique, because they break out of the cycle and find their way out earlier before their successful certificate mates start looking for jobs as was told earlier. These dropouts saw the trap and bypass it early before their school mates, and so they remain at the top and even employ their mate in their company. The explanation wasn't straight and forward, when we were little, only few kids didn't cry while taken to school, that was a general natural syndrome among kids in my locality, they never wanted to go to school, because of the fun at home, it was all a battle, and parents had to come up with nice good stories around the things children crave for and promise them that after schooling they'll have all that cars, houses, and mansion. It was a promise, and not a lie, people do go to school, graduate, get the job, and live their dream life for a while. Yes it works that way, but like anything else in life, not for everybody. When something like Education is generalized it'll get faulty at the level of distribution and accomplishments. Not all the students are able to offer what they've read in school. It's also true that the school never did well in making everyone a specialist, but some who knew of a course and practices it, had better opportunities when with the right network. In a nutshell, the society should focus more on changing the narratives of schools as a place for immediate riches, to a place for networking and creating value, this will go a long way in diluting the misunderstanding between graduates, schools and parents.

I know different opinions and ideas may arise, but I'll be more willing to read and reflect each of it. The system of schooling do not create builders, rather it molds earners, and mind you, salary do not make you rich but makes you survive through the economy. Those that are actually rich, name them, are people that failed out of school, think outside the box and build something unique, because they break out of the cycle and find their way out earlier before their successful certificate mates start looking for jobs as was told earlier. These dropouts saw the trap and bypass it early before their school mates, and so they remain at the top and even employ their mate in their company. The explanation wasn't straight and forward, when we were little, only few kids didn't cry while taken to school, that was a general natural syndrome among kids in my locality, they never wanted to go to school, because of the fun at home, it was all a battle, and parents had to come up with nice good stories around the things children crave for and promise them that after schooling they'll have all that cars, houses, and mansion. It was a promise, and not a lie, people do go to school, graduate, get the job, and live their dream life for a while. Yes it works that way, but like anything else in life, not for everybody. When something like Education is generalized it'll get faulty at the level of distribution and accomplishments. Not all the students are able to offer what they've read in school. It's also true that the school never did well in making everyone a specialist, but some who knew of a course and practices it, had better opportunities when with the right network. In a nutshell, the society should focus more on changing the narratives of schools as a place for immediate riches, to a place for networking and creating value, this will go a long way in diluting the misunderstanding between graduates, schools and parents.

I know different opinions and ideas may arise, but I'll be more willing to read and reflect each of it. The system of schooling do not create builders, rather it molds earners, and mind you, salary do not make you rich but makes you survive through the economy. Those that are actually rich, name them, are people that failed out of school, think outside the box and build something unique, because they break out of the cycle and find their way out earlier before their successful certificate mates start looking for jobs as was told earlier. These dropouts saw the trap and bypass it early before their school mates, and so they remain at the top and even employ their mate in their company. The explanation wasn't straight and forward, when we were little, only few kids didn't cry while taken to school, that was a general natural syndrome among kids in my locality, they never wanted to go to school, because of the fun at home, it was all a battle, and parents had to come up with nice good stories around the things children crave for and promise them that after schooling they'll have all that cars, houses, and mansion. It was a promise, and not a lie, people do go to school, graduate, get the job, and live their dream life for a while. Yes it works that way, but like anything else in life, not for everybody. When something like Education is generalized it'll get faulty at the level of distribution and accomplishments. Not all the students are able to offer what they've read in school. It's also true that the school never did well in making everyone a specialist, but some who knew of a course and practices it, had better opportunities when with the right network. In a nutshell, the society should focus more on changing the narratives of schools as a place for immediate riches, to a place for networking and creating value, this will go a long way in diluting the misunderstanding between graduates, schools and parents.