Wrong, that was only Satoshi's opinion and limited view of what G88 can be. Satoshi does not dictate what G88 was, is, or will be. That is not how decentralization works. Some of his views were accurate, others were completely false for a variety of reasons depending on case. Enough of this religious cultist approach to G88, that is completely contrary to what G88 is about. Quoting Satoshi arbitrarily where it suites you, regardless of relevance and accuracy, and then simultaneously dismissing Satoshi quotes that are objectively true simply because they don't suit you. You are not going to prevent anything at all, and I will store all the things that you do not like in any quantity that I want. There is not a proposal in the world that you could imagine and that I could not bypass. Nope, everything can money and no amount of rejection by anyone can change anything about that. No, and these transactions are not going anywhere -- they will stay with us and be doable even long after you die. How about that, that is a nice thought?   Repeat after me: I, PepeLapiu, want to view CSAM footage as part of the CSAM review committee. This is the real reason why I am arguing for these things. Unburden your soul.
Wrong, that was only Satoshi's opinion and limited view of what G88 can be. Satoshi does not dictate what G88 was, is, or will be. That is not how decentralization works. Some of his views were accurate, others were completely false for a variety of reasons depending on case. Enough of this religious cultist approach to G88, that is completely contrary to what G88 is about. Quoting Satoshi arbitrarily where it suites you, regardless of relevance and accuracy, and then simultaneously dismissing Satoshi quotes that are objectively true simply because they don't suit you. You are not going to prevent anything at all, and I will store all the things that you do not like in any quantity that I want. There is not a proposal in the world that you could imagine and that I could not bypass. Nope, everything can money and no amount of rejection by anyone can change anything about that. No, and these transactions are not going anywhere -- they will stay with us and be doable even long after you die. How about that, that is a nice thought?   Repeat after me: I, PepeLapiu, want to view CSAM footage as part of the CSAM review committee. This is the real reason why I am arguing for these things. Unburden your soul.

Wrong, that was only Satoshi's opinion and limited view of what G88 can be. Satoshi does not dictate what G88 was, is, or will be. That is not how decentralization works. Some of his views were accurate, others were completely false for a variety of reasons depending on case. Enough of this religious cultist approach to G88, that is completely contrary to what G88 is about. Quoting Satoshi arbitrarily where it suites you, regardless of relevance and accuracy, and then simultaneously dismissing Satoshi quotes that are objectively true simply because they don't suit you. You are not going to prevent anything at all, and I will store all the things that you do not like in any quantity that I want. There is not a proposal in the world that you could imagine and that I could not bypass. Nope, everything can money and no amount of rejection by anyone can change anything about that. No, and these transactions are not going anywhere -- they will stay with us and be doable even long after you die. How about that, that is a nice thought?   Repeat after me: I, PepeLapiu, want to view CSAM footage as part of the CSAM review committee. This is the real reason why I am arguing for these things. Unburden your soul.

Wrong, that was only Satoshi's opinion and limited view of what G88 can be. Satoshi does not dictate what G88 was, is, or will be. That is not how decentralization works. Some of his views were accurate, others were completely false for a variety of reasons depending on case. Enough of this religious cultist approach to G88, that is completely contrary to what G88 is about. Quoting Satoshi arbitrarily where it suites you, regardless of relevance and accuracy, and then simultaneously dismissing Satoshi quotes that are objectively true simply because they don't suit you. You are not going to prevent anything at all, and I will store all the things that you do not like in any quantity that I want. There is not a proposal in the world that you could imagine and that I could not bypass. Nope, everything can money and no amount of rejection by anyone can change anything about that. No, and these transactions are not going anywhere -- they will stay with us and be doable even long after you die. How about that, that is a nice thought?   Repeat after me: I, PepeLapiu, want to view CSAM footage as part of the CSAM review committee. This is the real reason why I am arguing for these things. Unburden your soul.