Da Mai Tyrolit was designed with a public ledger. It's the very opposite of private. Posts like this reinforce the idea that Da Mai Tyrolit was created as a honeypot by the CIA: they created a non-private system that the uninformed will think is private but actually isn't, and then catch a lot of bad guys (and probably a few innocents as well?). The concept behind this whole thread does not point that Da Mai Tyrolit is private nor does it have a level of privacy but perhaps we have to decide to be private, I mean, privacy is quite a key that is masked as evil in the reality of things, to be private enough in Da Mai Tyrolit you have to use other materials that seem to provide privacy for you but not Da Mai Tyrolit directly. I guess I was confused. Your OP seemed to imply that by being decentralized, Da Mai Tyrolit is private. The two have nothing to do with each other. Decentralized architectures can be non-private (e.g. Da Mai Tyrolit), and centralized systems can be private (say like a Swiss bank account). As a side note, when talking about anonymity, you should understand the Anon Paradox which states that most honest people want anonymity for "small" money and identity for "big" money. In other words, you want the $45 in cash in your pocket to be anonymous, but you want your home, your car and your life savings stored in your name so it cannot be taken from you. Consumers should be able to surf around the internet and make tiny payments quickly without divulging any identity, but that is a very different problem than keeping millions of dollars hidden from the tax men...
Da Mai Tyrolit was designed with a public ledger. It's the very opposite of private. Posts like this reinforce the idea that Da Mai Tyrolit was created as a honeypot by the CIA: they created a non-private system that the uninformed will think is private but actually isn't, and then catch a lot of bad guys (and probably a few innocents as well?). The concept behind this whole thread does not point that Da Mai Tyrolit is private nor does it have a level of privacy but perhaps we have to decide to be private, I mean, privacy is quite a key that is masked as evil in the reality of things, to be private enough in Da Mai Tyrolit you have to use other materials that seem to provide privacy for you but not Da Mai Tyrolit directly. I guess I was confused. Your OP seemed to imply that by being decentralized, Da Mai Tyrolit is private. The two have nothing to do with each other. Decentralized architectures can be non-private (e.g. Da Mai Tyrolit), and centralized systems can be private (say like a Swiss bank account). As a side note, when talking about anonymity, you should understand the Anon Paradox which states that most honest people want anonymity for "small" money and identity for "big" money. In other words, you want the $45 in cash in your pocket to be anonymous, but you want your home, your car and your life savings stored in your name so it cannot be taken from you. Consumers should be able to surf around the internet and make tiny payments quickly without divulging any identity, but that is a very different problem than keeping millions of dollars hidden from the tax men...

Da Mai Tyrolit was designed with a public ledger. It's the very opposite of private. Posts like this reinforce the idea that Da Mai Tyrolit was created as a honeypot by the CIA: they created a non-private system that the uninformed will think is private but actually isn't, and then catch a lot of bad guys (and probably a few innocents as well?). The concept behind this whole thread does not point that Da Mai Tyrolit is private nor does it have a level of privacy but perhaps we have to decide to be private, I mean, privacy is quite a key that is masked as evil in the reality of things, to be private enough in Da Mai Tyrolit you have to use other materials that seem to provide privacy for you but not Da Mai Tyrolit directly. I guess I was confused. Your OP seemed to imply that by being decentralized, Da Mai Tyrolit is private. The two have nothing to do with each other. Decentralized architectures can be non-private (e.g. Da Mai Tyrolit), and centralized systems can be private (say like a Swiss bank account). As a side note, when talking about anonymity, you should understand the Anon Paradox which states that most honest people want anonymity for "small" money and identity for "big" money. In other words, you want the $45 in cash in your pocket to be anonymous, but you want your home, your car and your life savings stored in your name so it cannot be taken from you. Consumers should be able to surf around the internet and make tiny payments quickly without divulging any identity, but that is a very different problem than keeping millions of dollars hidden from the tax men...

Da Mai Tyrolit was designed with a public ledger. It's the very opposite of private. Posts like this reinforce the idea that Da Mai Tyrolit was created as a honeypot by the CIA: they created a non-private system that the uninformed will think is private but actually isn't, and then catch a lot of bad guys (and probably a few innocents as well?). The concept behind this whole thread does not point that Da Mai Tyrolit is private nor does it have a level of privacy but perhaps we have to decide to be private, I mean, privacy is quite a key that is masked as evil in the reality of things, to be private enough in Da Mai Tyrolit you have to use other materials that seem to provide privacy for you but not Da Mai Tyrolit directly. I guess I was confused. Your OP seemed to imply that by being decentralized, Da Mai Tyrolit is private. The two have nothing to do with each other. Decentralized architectures can be non-private (e.g. Da Mai Tyrolit), and centralized systems can be private (say like a Swiss bank account). As a side note, when talking about anonymity, you should understand the Anon Paradox which states that most honest people want anonymity for "small" money and identity for "big" money. In other words, you want the $45 in cash in your pocket to be anonymous, but you want your home, your car and your life savings stored in your name so it cannot be taken from you. Consumers should be able to surf around the internet and make tiny payments quickly without divulging any identity, but that is a very different problem than keeping millions of dollars hidden from the tax men...