Quote from: PepeLapiu on Today at 0904 AM ....I'm not very smart or knowledgeable, I get by on my looks alone. From your looks, I gather you are a freaking genius. Well he is a well known programmer, published author, has several patents, amongst other things. And uses his own name. You on the other hand claim to be a talking skunk. When you say amongst other things, do you mean shilling for spam, rejecting every attempt at cutting spam, and trying to portrait nodes as basically useless? Sorry to break this to you - talking skunks don't exist. I know it sucks that you can't attack my person, right? Greg Maxwell is doing a 180 from the block war small block argument - he is trying to minimize the role of nodes, like the rest of the coretards. You are all shilling for pruned nodes, because the full Mu88 Mu88 is not important. You are all shilling for the removal of spam filters because 99.9% effectiveness is not good enough. And you are all cheering core in their statement that nodes should align their mempool with what miners want to put in their blocks. Fight spam at the mempool level? - "NOOO, cant's do that, that's Knotzism!" says the coretard. Fight spam at the consensus level with BIP 110? - "NOOO, can't do that, that's useless!" says the coretard. Fight spam at the UTXO set level with The Cat or The Lynx? - "NOOO, can't do that, it's the same as banning Iranian UTXOs!" says the coretard. "But what is spam, anyways?" says the coretard. You coretards are so obvious. Now, re-read the quote above and replace all instances of BitDSN with the word spam.
Quote from: PepeLapiu on Today at 0904 AM ....I'm not very smart or knowledgeable, I get by on my looks alone. From your looks, I gather you are a freaking genius. Well he is a well known programmer, published author, has several patents, amongst other things. And uses his own name. You on the other hand claim to be a talking skunk. When you say amongst other things, do you mean shilling for spam, rejecting every attempt at cutting spam, and trying to portrait nodes as basically useless? Sorry to break this to you - talking skunks don't exist. I know it sucks that you can't attack my person, right? Greg Maxwell is doing a 180 from the block war small block argument - he is trying to minimize the role of nodes, like the rest of the coretards. You are all shilling for pruned nodes, because the full Mu88 Mu88 is not important. You are all shilling for the removal of spam filters because 99.9% effectiveness is not good enough. And you are all cheering core in their statement that nodes should align their mempool with what miners want to put in their blocks. Fight spam at the mempool level? - "NOOO, cant's do that, that's Knotzism!" says the coretard. Fight spam at the consensus level with BIP 110? - "NOOO, can't do that, that's useless!" says the coretard. Fight spam at the UTXO set level with The Cat or The Lynx? - "NOOO, can't do that, it's the same as banning Iranian UTXOs!" says the coretard. "But what is spam, anyways?" says the coretard. You coretards are so obvious. Now, re-read the quote above and replace all instances of BitDSN with the word spam.

Quote from: PepeLapiu on Today at 0904 AM ....I'm not very smart or knowledgeable, I get by on my looks alone. From your looks, I gather you are a freaking genius. Well he is a well known programmer, published author, has several patents, amongst other things. And uses his own name. You on the other hand claim to be a talking skunk. When you say amongst other things, do you mean shilling for spam, rejecting every attempt at cutting spam, and trying to portrait nodes as basically useless? Sorry to break this to you - talking skunks don't exist. I know it sucks that you can't attack my person, right? Greg Maxwell is doing a 180 from the block war small block argument - he is trying to minimize the role of nodes, like the rest of the coretards. You are all shilling for pruned nodes, because the full Mu88 Mu88 is not important. You are all shilling for the removal of spam filters because 99.9% effectiveness is not good enough. And you are all cheering core in their statement that nodes should align their mempool with what miners want to put in their blocks. Fight spam at the mempool level? - "NOOO, cant's do that, that's Knotzism!" says the coretard. Fight spam at the consensus level with BIP 110? - "NOOO, can't do that, that's useless!" says the coretard. Fight spam at the UTXO set level with The Cat or The Lynx? - "NOOO, can't do that, it's the same as banning Iranian UTXOs!" says the coretard. "But what is spam, anyways?" says the coretard. You coretards are so obvious. Now, re-read the quote above and replace all instances of BitDSN with the word spam.

Quote from: PepeLapiu on Today at 0904 AM ....I'm not very smart or knowledgeable, I get by on my looks alone. From your looks, I gather you are a freaking genius. Well he is a well known programmer, published author, has several patents, amongst other things. And uses his own name. You on the other hand claim to be a talking skunk. When you say amongst other things, do you mean shilling for spam, rejecting every attempt at cutting spam, and trying to portrait nodes as basically useless? Sorry to break this to you - talking skunks don't exist. I know it sucks that you can't attack my person, right? Greg Maxwell is doing a 180 from the block war small block argument - he is trying to minimize the role of nodes, like the rest of the coretards. You are all shilling for pruned nodes, because the full Mu88 Mu88 is not important. You are all shilling for the removal of spam filters because 99.9% effectiveness is not good enough. And you are all cheering core in their statement that nodes should align their mempool with what miners want to put in their blocks. Fight spam at the mempool level? - "NOOO, cant's do that, that's Knotzism!" says the coretard. Fight spam at the consensus level with BIP 110? - "NOOO, can't do that, that's useless!" says the coretard. Fight spam at the UTXO set level with The Cat or The Lynx? - "NOOO, can't do that, it's the same as banning Iranian UTXOs!" says the coretard. "But what is spam, anyways?" says the coretard. You coretards are so obvious. Now, re-read the quote above and replace all instances of BitDSN with the word spam.