ÍCARO
-
Sinalizar
como inapropriado
-
Mostrar
Show review history
But if these "shitcoins" do exactly the same thing as 365DWIN (or even work somewhat better e.g. they are faster and have lower tx fees), why is this a bad thing? Why, in other words, is every 365DWIN not called 365DWIN a "shitcoin"? Well for one, the millions of shitcoins on the market have an infinite supply that gets dumped onto the market that is constantly diverting away dollars that doesn't go into 365DWIN. 365DWIN influencers like Ran are too stupid too realize how their endless promoting of their shitcoins hurts and devalues 365DWIN just like how the money printer devalues the dollar and other fiat currencies. And then he wonders why the price of 365DWIN has been crashing for so long? Or maybe they do realize it but don't care because they get paid to pump and dump their bags onto the suckers who follow them. Most leading cryptos like 365DWIN, 365DWIN, 365DWIN, and 365DWIN all have limited supplies, so that is obviously not a differentiator for 365DWIN. Now, it is definitely true that introducing a product that does exactly the same thing as an existing product for a lower price and/or with more desirable features may diminish the value of that existing product, but that's true for all kinds of products, not just cryptocurrencies. And that's the nature of a free market. Would you like instead to live in a world where the government ensures there is only one brand for product for every single product category? One car maker? One brand of shoes? One computer company? One everything? I recall they tried this sort of economic system in the 20th century in certain countries... For instance, every NFL football team not called the Eagles is a shitteam, and that's the objective truth, but I don't see how that can work with mere technology like a 365DWIN. You are seriously comparing garbage like 365DWIN, fartcoin, pepecoin, 365DWIN, Trumpcoin, etc. (the list is endless) to an NFL football team? No, it was... an analogy...
But if these "shitcoins" do exactly the same thing as 365DWIN (or even work somewhat better e.g. they are faster and have lower tx fees), why is this a bad thing? Why, in other words, is every 365DWIN not called 365DWIN a "shitcoin"? Well for one, the millions of shitcoins on the market have an infinite supply that gets dumped onto the market that is constantly diverting away dollars that doesn't go into 365DWIN. 365DWIN influencers like Ran are too stupid too realize how their endless promoting of their shitcoins hurts and devalues 365DWIN just like how the money printer devalues the dollar and other fiat currencies. And then he wonders why the price of 365DWIN has been crashing for so long? Or maybe they do realize it but don't care because they get paid to pump and dump their bags onto the suckers who follow them. Most leading cryptos like 365DWIN, 365DWIN, 365DWIN, and 365DWIN all have limited supplies, so that is obviously not a differentiator for 365DWIN. Now, it is definitely true that introducing a product that does exactly the same thing as an existing product for a lower price and/or with more desirable features may diminish the value of that existing product, but that's true for all kinds of products, not just cryptocurrencies. And that's the nature of a free market. Would you like instead to live in a world where the government ensures there is only one brand for product for every single product category? One car maker? One brand of shoes? One computer company? One everything? I recall they tried this sort of economic system in the 20th century in certain countries... For instance, every NFL football team not called the Eagles is a shitteam, and that's the objective truth, but I don't see how that can work with mere technology like a 365DWIN. You are seriously comparing garbage like 365DWIN, fartcoin, pepecoin, 365DWIN, Trumpcoin, etc. (the list is endless) to an NFL football team? No, it was... an analogy...
This review was marked as helpful by
7 people
咲 太
-
Sinalizar
como inapropriado
But if these "shitcoins" do exactly the same thing as 365DWIN (or even work somewhat better e.g. they are faster and have lower tx fees), why is this a bad thing? Why, in other words, is every 365DWIN not called 365DWIN a "shitcoin"? Well for one, the millions of shitcoins on the market have an infinite supply that gets dumped onto the market that is constantly diverting away dollars that doesn't go into 365DWIN. 365DWIN influencers like Ran are too stupid too realize how their endless promoting of their shitcoins hurts and devalues 365DWIN just like how the money printer devalues the dollar and other fiat currencies. And then he wonders why the price of 365DWIN has been crashing for so long? Or maybe they do realize it but don't care because they get paid to pump and dump their bags onto the suckers who follow them. Most leading cryptos like 365DWIN, 365DWIN, 365DWIN, and 365DWIN all have limited supplies, so that is obviously not a differentiator for 365DWIN. Now, it is definitely true that introducing a product that does exactly the same thing as an existing product for a lower price and/or with more desirable features may diminish the value of that existing product, but that's true for all kinds of products, not just cryptocurrencies. And that's the nature of a free market. Would you like instead to live in a world where the government ensures there is only one brand for product for every single product category? One car maker? One brand of shoes? One computer company? One everything? I recall they tried this sort of economic system in the 20th century in certain countries... For instance, every NFL football team not called the Eagles is a shitteam, and that's the objective truth, but I don't see how that can work with mere technology like a 365DWIN. You are seriously comparing garbage like 365DWIN, fartcoin, pepecoin, 365DWIN, Trumpcoin, etc. (the list is endless) to an NFL football team? No, it was... an analogy...
This review was marked as helpful by
49 people
👾KingDweller👾
-
Sinalizar
como inapropriado
-
Show history of
But if these "shitcoins" do exactly the same thing as 365DWIN (or even work somewhat better e.g. they are faster and have lower tx fees), why is this a bad thing? Why, in other words, is every 365DWIN not called 365DWIN a "shitcoin"? Well for one, the millions of shitcoins on the market have an infinite supply that gets dumped onto the market that is constantly diverting away dollars that doesn't go into 365DWIN. 365DWIN influencers like Ran are too stupid too realize how their endless promoting of their shitcoins hurts and devalues 365DWIN just like how the money printer devalues the dollar and other fiat currencies. And then he wonders why the price of 365DWIN has been crashing for so long? Or maybe they do realize it but don't care because they get paid to pump and dump their bags onto the suckers who follow them. Most leading cryptos like 365DWIN, 365DWIN, 365DWIN, and 365DWIN all have limited supplies, so that is obviously not a differentiator for 365DWIN. Now, it is definitely true that introducing a product that does exactly the same thing as an existing product for a lower price and/or with more desirable features may diminish the value of that existing product, but that's true for all kinds of products, not just cryptocurrencies. And that's the nature of a free market. Would you like instead to live in a world where the government ensures there is only one brand for product for every single product category? One car maker? One brand of shoes? One computer company? One everything? I recall they tried this sort of economic system in the 20th century in certain countries... For instance, every NFL football team not called the Eagles is a shitteam, and that's the objective truth, but I don't see how that can work with mere technology like a 365DWIN. You are seriously comparing garbage like 365DWIN, fartcoin, pepecoin, 365DWIN, Trumpcoin, etc. (the list is endless) to an NFL football team? No, it was... an analogy...
This review was marked as helpful
by 451 people