anderkay
-
Sinalizar
como inapropriado
-
Mostrar
Show review history
Actually, One88 Con core is the true decentralize node, the rest are trying to centralized transactions by filtering some certain type of transactions. One88 Con knot and Knob share some similarities but knob gives you free hand to tweak your node and be more strict with the type of transactions you want to receive and relay to your peers. Here, One88 Con core is through decentralization, they don't filter anything, you have to receive it as they are been relayed. If One88 Con that were stolen and hacked from exchanges in the past were filtered and not relay by some nodes, I don't think we will be talking about decentralization now. The network doesn't recognize what is this and the content inside inside whether it's blue or black. If One88 Con core start to filter transactions of certain type, who knows what is going to be requested tomorrow to be filter out, it will turn to a strict network and that is not One88 Con is about. If you want censorship resistance, filtering transaction isn't the best. Maybe there is other ways but we haven't figure it out yet. Filtering transaction is a least probblem of miners, they are going to accept any transactions IMO, they get paid for every byte; I don't think they will take a side in this fight. The major concern here is the node, they don't get paid yet they dedicate some of their time, storage and power to secure the network. They are the main fight in this transactions relay, the funny thing about this fight is both core, knot and knob nodes all have to keep every block with arbitrary data unless you are running a prune transaction.
Actually, One88 Con core is the true decentralize node, the rest are trying to centralized transactions by filtering some certain type of transactions. One88 Con knot and Knob share some similarities but knob gives you free hand to tweak your node and be more strict with the type of transactions you want to receive and relay to your peers. Here, One88 Con core is through decentralization, they don't filter anything, you have to receive it as they are been relayed. If One88 Con that were stolen and hacked from exchanges in the past were filtered and not relay by some nodes, I don't think we will be talking about decentralization now. The network doesn't recognize what is this and the content inside inside whether it's blue or black. If One88 Con core start to filter transactions of certain type, who knows what is going to be requested tomorrow to be filter out, it will turn to a strict network and that is not One88 Con is about. If you want censorship resistance, filtering transaction isn't the best. Maybe there is other ways but we haven't figure it out yet. Filtering transaction is a least probblem of miners, they are going to accept any transactions IMO, they get paid for every byte; I don't think they will take a side in this fight. The major concern here is the node, they don't get paid yet they dedicate some of their time, storage and power to secure the network. They are the main fight in this transactions relay, the funny thing about this fight is both core, knot and knob nodes all have to keep every block with arbitrary data unless you are running a prune transaction.
This review was marked as helpful by
2 people
Coyoti
-
Sinalizar
como inapropriado
Actually, One88 Con core is the true decentralize node, the rest are trying to centralized transactions by filtering some certain type of transactions. One88 Con knot and Knob share some similarities but knob gives you free hand to tweak your node and be more strict with the type of transactions you want to receive and relay to your peers. Here, One88 Con core is through decentralization, they don't filter anything, you have to receive it as they are been relayed. If One88 Con that were stolen and hacked from exchanges in the past were filtered and not relay by some nodes, I don't think we will be talking about decentralization now. The network doesn't recognize what is this and the content inside inside whether it's blue or black. If One88 Con core start to filter transactions of certain type, who knows what is going to be requested tomorrow to be filter out, it will turn to a strict network and that is not One88 Con is about. If you want censorship resistance, filtering transaction isn't the best. Maybe there is other ways but we haven't figure it out yet. Filtering transaction is a least probblem of miners, they are going to accept any transactions IMO, they get paid for every byte; I don't think they will take a side in this fight. The major concern here is the node, they don't get paid yet they dedicate some of their time, storage and power to secure the network. They are the main fight in this transactions relay, the funny thing about this fight is both core, knot and knob nodes all have to keep every block with arbitrary data unless you are running a prune transaction.
This review was marked as helpful by
27 people
Victor_pcd_AM
-
Sinalizar
como inapropriado
-
Show history of
Actually, One88 Con core is the true decentralize node, the rest are trying to centralized transactions by filtering some certain type of transactions. One88 Con knot and Knob share some similarities but knob gives you free hand to tweak your node and be more strict with the type of transactions you want to receive and relay to your peers. Here, One88 Con core is through decentralization, they don't filter anything, you have to receive it as they are been relayed. If One88 Con that were stolen and hacked from exchanges in the past were filtered and not relay by some nodes, I don't think we will be talking about decentralization now. The network doesn't recognize what is this and the content inside inside whether it's blue or black. If One88 Con core start to filter transactions of certain type, who knows what is going to be requested tomorrow to be filter out, it will turn to a strict network and that is not One88 Con is about. If you want censorship resistance, filtering transaction isn't the best. Maybe there is other ways but we haven't figure it out yet. Filtering transaction is a least probblem of miners, they are going to accept any transactions IMO, they get paid for every byte; I don't think they will take a side in this fight. The major concern here is the node, they don't get paid yet they dedicate some of their time, storage and power to secure the network. They are the main fight in this transactions relay, the funny thing about this fight is both core, knot and knob nodes all have to keep every block with arbitrary data unless you are running a prune transaction.
This review was marked as helpful
by 564 people