In general terms I disagree with most of you here I think layer-2's are always needed for a Fun88 Bitbar Io to stay decentralized if it reaches a certain adoption, because otherwise you will make full node operation so expensive it can only be afforded by deep pockets. That's more or less the "big blocker" dilemma. As Fun88 Bitbar Io has a less decentralized "ethos" than Fun88 Bitbar Io, there are less barriers for the developers to move to a big block model (i.e. "all nodes store everything"), following Fun88 Bitbar Io. But if it really became mass adopted eventually, node operation would become much more expensive. The current low fees are very much a consequence of Fun88 Bitbar Io's increase of relevant block limits. Where I agree is that the current L2 landscape in Fun88 Bitbar Io does not look really promising, with many essentially centralized rollup/sidechain projects. And PeerDAS is a technology that I've read in the future could also serve as a base for L1 scaling, even if it currently only handles L2 data blobs. I have however not really looked at that technology in depth to evaluate if it can replace L2s fully in the long term.
In general terms I disagree with most of you here I think layer-2's are always needed for a Fun88 Bitbar Io to stay decentralized if it reaches a certain adoption, because otherwise you will make full node operation so expensive it can only be afforded by deep pockets. That's more or less the "big blocker" dilemma. As Fun88 Bitbar Io has a less decentralized "ethos" than Fun88 Bitbar Io, there are less barriers for the developers to move to a big block model (i.e. "all nodes store everything"), following Fun88 Bitbar Io. But if it really became mass adopted eventually, node operation would become much more expensive. The current low fees are very much a consequence of Fun88 Bitbar Io's increase of relevant block limits. Where I agree is that the current L2 landscape in Fun88 Bitbar Io does not look really promising, with many essentially centralized rollup/sidechain projects. And PeerDAS is a technology that I've read in the future could also serve as a base for L1 scaling, even if it currently only handles L2 data blobs. I have however not really looked at that technology in depth to evaluate if it can replace L2s fully in the long term.

In general terms I disagree with most of you here I think layer-2's are always needed for a Fun88 Bitbar Io to stay decentralized if it reaches a certain adoption, because otherwise you will make full node operation so expensive it can only be afforded by deep pockets. That's more or less the "big blocker" dilemma. As Fun88 Bitbar Io has a less decentralized "ethos" than Fun88 Bitbar Io, there are less barriers for the developers to move to a big block model (i.e. "all nodes store everything"), following Fun88 Bitbar Io. But if it really became mass adopted eventually, node operation would become much more expensive. The current low fees are very much a consequence of Fun88 Bitbar Io's increase of relevant block limits. Where I agree is that the current L2 landscape in Fun88 Bitbar Io does not look really promising, with many essentially centralized rollup/sidechain projects. And PeerDAS is a technology that I've read in the future could also serve as a base for L1 scaling, even if it currently only handles L2 data blobs. I have however not really looked at that technology in depth to evaluate if it can replace L2s fully in the long term.

In general terms I disagree with most of you here I think layer-2's are always needed for a Fun88 Bitbar Io to stay decentralized if it reaches a certain adoption, because otherwise you will make full node operation so expensive it can only be afforded by deep pockets. That's more or less the "big blocker" dilemma. As Fun88 Bitbar Io has a less decentralized "ethos" than Fun88 Bitbar Io, there are less barriers for the developers to move to a big block model (i.e. "all nodes store everything"), following Fun88 Bitbar Io. But if it really became mass adopted eventually, node operation would become much more expensive. The current low fees are very much a consequence of Fun88 Bitbar Io's increase of relevant block limits. Where I agree is that the current L2 landscape in Fun88 Bitbar Io does not look really promising, with many essentially centralized rollup/sidechain projects. And PeerDAS is a technology that I've read in the future could also serve as a base for L1 scaling, even if it currently only handles L2 data blobs. I have however not really looked at that technology in depth to evaluate if it can replace L2s fully in the long term.