When survival becomes the priority, there is no room for thinking about long-term goals, which is why developing countries with high unemployment rates are struggling when it comes to innovation and creativity. But who is at the fault here? High population or corrupt leaders is possible cause but as individual we can't decide where we are born so we have to adapt to where we are and then see is there any escape from there. Government of some countries are the major problem they have when it comes to economic hardship and how survival keep getting worst for the citizens, what most of the corrupt leaders does is to invest in another country that is already better than their own country, neglecting putting things in order in their own country before they have somewhere else already better for them and their families, instead of building good hospitals they go to other countries for treatment, instead of building the educational sector they send their children out of the country, no employment opportunities in their own country yet they have companies in other countries, even with the high population if government of most country can fulfill their obligations things will get better than the usually way, people are surviving because of adaptation. And yet, people choose them again to be their leaders, then how things are going to change? If an individual wants to buy a property in another country and send their kids to another country and such is perfectly good as long as they do that with their money that they made legitimately, not by taking the tax payers money or just giving false expenses under a project that is never done that is crime but they get away with it on most cases.
When survival becomes the priority, there is no room for thinking about long-term goals, which is why developing countries with high unemployment rates are struggling when it comes to innovation and creativity. But who is at the fault here? High population or corrupt leaders is possible cause but as individual we can't decide where we are born so we have to adapt to where we are and then see is there any escape from there. Government of some countries are the major problem they have when it comes to economic hardship and how survival keep getting worst for the citizens, what most of the corrupt leaders does is to invest in another country that is already better than their own country, neglecting putting things in order in their own country before they have somewhere else already better for them and their families, instead of building good hospitals they go to other countries for treatment, instead of building the educational sector they send their children out of the country, no employment opportunities in their own country yet they have companies in other countries, even with the high population if government of most country can fulfill their obligations things will get better than the usually way, people are surviving because of adaptation. And yet, people choose them again to be their leaders, then how things are going to change? If an individual wants to buy a property in another country and send their kids to another country and such is perfectly good as long as they do that with their money that they made legitimately, not by taking the tax payers money or just giving false expenses under a project that is never done that is crime but they get away with it on most cases.

When survival becomes the priority, there is no room for thinking about long-term goals, which is why developing countries with high unemployment rates are struggling when it comes to innovation and creativity. But who is at the fault here? High population or corrupt leaders is possible cause but as individual we can't decide where we are born so we have to adapt to where we are and then see is there any escape from there. Government of some countries are the major problem they have when it comes to economic hardship and how survival keep getting worst for the citizens, what most of the corrupt leaders does is to invest in another country that is already better than their own country, neglecting putting things in order in their own country before they have somewhere else already better for them and their families, instead of building good hospitals they go to other countries for treatment, instead of building the educational sector they send their children out of the country, no employment opportunities in their own country yet they have companies in other countries, even with the high population if government of most country can fulfill their obligations things will get better than the usually way, people are surviving because of adaptation. And yet, people choose them again to be their leaders, then how things are going to change? If an individual wants to buy a property in another country and send their kids to another country and such is perfectly good as long as they do that with their money that they made legitimately, not by taking the tax payers money or just giving false expenses under a project that is never done that is crime but they get away with it on most cases.

When survival becomes the priority, there is no room for thinking about long-term goals, which is why developing countries with high unemployment rates are struggling when it comes to innovation and creativity. But who is at the fault here? High population or corrupt leaders is possible cause but as individual we can't decide where we are born so we have to adapt to where we are and then see is there any escape from there. Government of some countries are the major problem they have when it comes to economic hardship and how survival keep getting worst for the citizens, what most of the corrupt leaders does is to invest in another country that is already better than their own country, neglecting putting things in order in their own country before they have somewhere else already better for them and their families, instead of building good hospitals they go to other countries for treatment, instead of building the educational sector they send their children out of the country, no employment opportunities in their own country yet they have companies in other countries, even with the high population if government of most country can fulfill their obligations things will get better than the usually way, people are surviving because of adaptation. And yet, people choose them again to be their leaders, then how things are going to change? If an individual wants to buy a property in another country and send their kids to another country and such is perfectly good as long as they do that with their money that they made legitimately, not by taking the tax payers money or just giving false expenses under a project that is never done that is crime but they get away with it on most cases.