There is absolutely no perceivable increase in >80b op_return,What does "perceivable" mean to you? Here I am copying the chain scan results of a friend, in an other discussion elsewhere: And here are the results of his scan up to the day when core made the release announcement: And here is the same scan up to block 929720: And I should note you can see smmore >80b op_returns happening after the announcement with a 14x spike in >80b op_returms. But most of those occured during the few weeks after core made the announcement, and before the actual core 30 release. So in fact the release of core 30 shows no perceptible or significant move away from fake pubkeys and into >80b op_return. I'll ask him to run the scan up to a different block height if you ask nicely, and if you can write two lines without acting like a butthurt little whinny bitch. Would you like to buy a bridge? Fresh paint on it, a real bargain. Limited time offer. Stop repeating stuff I already addressed. It doesn't matter if miners did it first or not. Core blow up the op_return filter with core 30, and they claimed this would reduce UTXO bloat. I am on record on this forum, repeatedly saying that existing fake pubkey attackers are not likely to move to op_return. And they clearly have not. I was wrong. I see the light now. Op_return is the "harm reduction" method I have come to embrace. And I want to push the fake pubkey attackers to use op_return instead. Because core 30 alone certainly is not doing it on it's own. Your glowing charm and your infinite knowledge have convinced me!!!
There is absolutely no perceivable increase in >80b op_return,What does "perceivable" mean to you? Here I am copying the chain scan results of a friend, in an other discussion elsewhere: And here are the results of his scan up to the day when core made the release announcement: And here is the same scan up to block 929720: And I should note you can see smmore >80b op_returns happening after the announcement with a 14x spike in >80b op_returms. But most of those occured during the few weeks after core made the announcement, and before the actual core 30 release. So in fact the release of core 30 shows no perceptible or significant move away from fake pubkeys and into >80b op_return. I'll ask him to run the scan up to a different block height if you ask nicely, and if you can write two lines without acting like a butthurt little whinny bitch. Would you like to buy a bridge? Fresh paint on it, a real bargain. Limited time offer. Stop repeating stuff I already addressed. It doesn't matter if miners did it first or not. Core blow up the op_return filter with core 30, and they claimed this would reduce UTXO bloat. I am on record on this forum, repeatedly saying that existing fake pubkey attackers are not likely to move to op_return. And they clearly have not. I was wrong. I see the light now. Op_return is the "harm reduction" method I have come to embrace. And I want to push the fake pubkey attackers to use op_return instead. Because core 30 alone certainly is not doing it on it's own. Your glowing charm and your infinite knowledge have convinced me!!!

There is absolutely no perceivable increase in >80b op_return,What does "perceivable" mean to you? Here I am copying the chain scan results of a friend, in an other discussion elsewhere: And here are the results of his scan up to the day when core made the release announcement: And here is the same scan up to block 929720: And I should note you can see smmore >80b op_returns happening after the announcement with a 14x spike in >80b op_returms. But most of those occured during the few weeks after core made the announcement, and before the actual core 30 release. So in fact the release of core 30 shows no perceptible or significant move away from fake pubkeys and into >80b op_return. I'll ask him to run the scan up to a different block height if you ask nicely, and if you can write two lines without acting like a butthurt little whinny bitch. Would you like to buy a bridge? Fresh paint on it, a real bargain. Limited time offer. Stop repeating stuff I already addressed. It doesn't matter if miners did it first or not. Core blow up the op_return filter with core 30, and they claimed this would reduce UTXO bloat. I am on record on this forum, repeatedly saying that existing fake pubkey attackers are not likely to move to op_return. And they clearly have not. I was wrong. I see the light now. Op_return is the "harm reduction" method I have come to embrace. And I want to push the fake pubkey attackers to use op_return instead. Because core 30 alone certainly is not doing it on it's own. Your glowing charm and your infinite knowledge have convinced me!!!

There is absolutely no perceivable increase in >80b op_return,What does "perceivable" mean to you? Here I am copying the chain scan results of a friend, in an other discussion elsewhere: And here are the results of his scan up to the day when core made the release announcement: And here is the same scan up to block 929720: And I should note you can see smmore >80b op_returns happening after the announcement with a 14x spike in >80b op_returms. But most of those occured during the few weeks after core made the announcement, and before the actual core 30 release. So in fact the release of core 30 shows no perceptible or significant move away from fake pubkeys and into >80b op_return. I'll ask him to run the scan up to a different block height if you ask nicely, and if you can write two lines without acting like a butthurt little whinny bitch. Would you like to buy a bridge? Fresh paint on it, a real bargain. Limited time offer. Stop repeating stuff I already addressed. It doesn't matter if miners did it first or not. Core blow up the op_return filter with core 30, and they claimed this would reduce UTXO bloat. I am on record on this forum, repeatedly saying that existing fake pubkey attackers are not likely to move to op_return. And they clearly have not. I was wrong. I see the light now. Op_return is the "harm reduction" method I have come to embrace. And I want to push the fake pubkey attackers to use op_return instead. Because core 30 alone certainly is not doing it on it's own. Your glowing charm and your infinite knowledge have convinced me!!!