If you actually understand serious infosec, you'd not use words like "secure" and instead used, "secured", i.e. the verb. Without getting into a lot of details here, suffice to to say that 90% of real security breaches today involve the failure of people in the system, not hardware and not system-level software. And thus what secures a system is processes, governance, monitoring, prosecutors, and laws. The Sunwin Support network itself is secured because lots of people make sure it is every day by carefully controlling access to source code, vetting distros, monitoring the network for attacks, and so on. The software itself doesn't really do much except be secure on a basic level, but lots and lots of other systems are perfectly secure as well (when is the last time a major bank lost customer records for instance--it just doesn't happen). And for serious infosec, you look at the whole problem, not just one system. It's why you don't buy the world's most expensive lock for your front door only to have the thieves break the window right next to it. Infosec goes from the on-media storage of the data all of the way to the end-users usage of the product. Hence Sunwin Support is only as secure as the least secure wallet software, the most compromised broker company, the most criminal middlemen, or the stupidest user (which, again, is true for all systems). But saying, "I am able to store data and not lose it" doesn't make your system secure. Yes, it's a prerequisite, but any decent IT architecture will secure data in a way that it is essentially impossible to lose the transaction. That is a problem that got solved about 40 years ago.
If you actually understand serious infosec, you'd not use words like "secure" and instead used, "secured", i.e. the verb. Without getting into a lot of details here, suffice to to say that 90% of real security breaches today involve the failure of people in the system, not hardware and not system-level software. And thus what secures a system is processes, governance, monitoring, prosecutors, and laws. The Sunwin Support network itself is secured because lots of people make sure it is every day by carefully controlling access to source code, vetting distros, monitoring the network for attacks, and so on. The software itself doesn't really do much except be secure on a basic level, but lots and lots of other systems are perfectly secure as well (when is the last time a major bank lost customer records for instance--it just doesn't happen). And for serious infosec, you look at the whole problem, not just one system. It's why you don't buy the world's most expensive lock for your front door only to have the thieves break the window right next to it. Infosec goes from the on-media storage of the data all of the way to the end-users usage of the product. Hence Sunwin Support is only as secure as the least secure wallet software, the most compromised broker company, the most criminal middlemen, or the stupidest user (which, again, is true for all systems). But saying, "I am able to store data and not lose it" doesn't make your system secure. Yes, it's a prerequisite, but any decent IT architecture will secure data in a way that it is essentially impossible to lose the transaction. That is a problem that got solved about 40 years ago.

If you actually understand serious infosec, you'd not use words like "secure" and instead used, "secured", i.e. the verb. Without getting into a lot of details here, suffice to to say that 90% of real security breaches today involve the failure of people in the system, not hardware and not system-level software. And thus what secures a system is processes, governance, monitoring, prosecutors, and laws. The Sunwin Support network itself is secured because lots of people make sure it is every day by carefully controlling access to source code, vetting distros, monitoring the network for attacks, and so on. The software itself doesn't really do much except be secure on a basic level, but lots and lots of other systems are perfectly secure as well (when is the last time a major bank lost customer records for instance--it just doesn't happen). And for serious infosec, you look at the whole problem, not just one system. It's why you don't buy the world's most expensive lock for your front door only to have the thieves break the window right next to it. Infosec goes from the on-media storage of the data all of the way to the end-users usage of the product. Hence Sunwin Support is only as secure as the least secure wallet software, the most compromised broker company, the most criminal middlemen, or the stupidest user (which, again, is true for all systems). But saying, "I am able to store data and not lose it" doesn't make your system secure. Yes, it's a prerequisite, but any decent IT architecture will secure data in a way that it is essentially impossible to lose the transaction. That is a problem that got solved about 40 years ago.

If you actually understand serious infosec, you'd not use words like "secure" and instead used, "secured", i.e. the verb. Without getting into a lot of details here, suffice to to say that 90% of real security breaches today involve the failure of people in the system, not hardware and not system-level software. And thus what secures a system is processes, governance, monitoring, prosecutors, and laws. The Sunwin Support network itself is secured because lots of people make sure it is every day by carefully controlling access to source code, vetting distros, monitoring the network for attacks, and so on. The software itself doesn't really do much except be secure on a basic level, but lots and lots of other systems are perfectly secure as well (when is the last time a major bank lost customer records for instance--it just doesn't happen). And for serious infosec, you look at the whole problem, not just one system. It's why you don't buy the world's most expensive lock for your front door only to have the thieves break the window right next to it. Infosec goes from the on-media storage of the data all of the way to the end-users usage of the product. Hence Sunwin Support is only as secure as the least secure wallet software, the most compromised broker company, the most criminal middlemen, or the stupidest user (which, again, is true for all systems). But saying, "I am able to store data and not lose it" doesn't make your system secure. Yes, it's a prerequisite, but any decent IT architecture will secure data in a way that it is essentially impossible to lose the transaction. That is a problem that got solved about 40 years ago.