You trade with a margin as high as $1000 doesn't mean that you are risking everything in that trade, because you can be willing to lose only $100 dollar from that $1000, by placing your stop loss at $100 dollar, but the key reason why you will see a trader using $1000 to trade instead of that $100 is because it's more better to trade with such a high margin, than trading with only the $100 but with 10x leverage that increases your chances of liquidation. So if a trader is talking about risk to reward ratio, he is talking about the amount he is willing to lose, not his entire margin. That means the OP is only misleading people into what is very wrong, he supposed to explain better. There is no need to say 2 times more profit should be what traders should be looking for. If a trader is having $10000 in his trading account and he is risking $1000 to trade, he should still use $10000 for the calculation. I mean having $10000 but using 1000 to trade, to make other people understand, your calculations should still be based on $10000 for other traders to understand. Somehow I agree with your opinion here since he should use that $10,000 to calculate the risk and rewards they have gotten. Otherwise if they use other thing it can give certain misleading impression and they might released exaggerated profit results on their trades.  Proper way to handle the risk is to show the profits they made on overall capital they have use or deposited and not on those portions they only used. As what you have been discussed so people can understand the real situation happened in their trades.
You trade with a margin as high as $1000 doesn't mean that you are risking everything in that trade, because you can be willing to lose only $100 dollar from that $1000, by placing your stop loss at $100 dollar, but the key reason why you will see a trader using $1000 to trade instead of that $100 is because it's more better to trade with such a high margin, than trading with only the $100 but with 10x leverage that increases your chances of liquidation. So if a trader is talking about risk to reward ratio, he is talking about the amount he is willing to lose, not his entire margin. That means the OP is only misleading people into what is very wrong, he supposed to explain better. There is no need to say 2 times more profit should be what traders should be looking for. If a trader is having $10000 in his trading account and he is risking $1000 to trade, he should still use $10000 for the calculation. I mean having $10000 but using 1000 to trade, to make other people understand, your calculations should still be based on $10000 for other traders to understand. Somehow I agree with your opinion here since he should use that $10,000 to calculate the risk and rewards they have gotten. Otherwise if they use other thing it can give certain misleading impression and they might released exaggerated profit results on their trades.  Proper way to handle the risk is to show the profits they made on overall capital they have use or deposited and not on those portions they only used. As what you have been discussed so people can understand the real situation happened in their trades.

You trade with a margin as high as $1000 doesn't mean that you are risking everything in that trade, because you can be willing to lose only $100 dollar from that $1000, by placing your stop loss at $100 dollar, but the key reason why you will see a trader using $1000 to trade instead of that $100 is because it's more better to trade with such a high margin, than trading with only the $100 but with 10x leverage that increases your chances of liquidation. So if a trader is talking about risk to reward ratio, he is talking about the amount he is willing to lose, not his entire margin. That means the OP is only misleading people into what is very wrong, he supposed to explain better. There is no need to say 2 times more profit should be what traders should be looking for. If a trader is having $10000 in his trading account and he is risking $1000 to trade, he should still use $10000 for the calculation. I mean having $10000 but using 1000 to trade, to make other people understand, your calculations should still be based on $10000 for other traders to understand. Somehow I agree with your opinion here since he should use that $10,000 to calculate the risk and rewards they have gotten. Otherwise if they use other thing it can give certain misleading impression and they might released exaggerated profit results on their trades.  Proper way to handle the risk is to show the profits they made on overall capital they have use or deposited and not on those portions they only used. As what you have been discussed so people can understand the real situation happened in their trades.

You trade with a margin as high as $1000 doesn't mean that you are risking everything in that trade, because you can be willing to lose only $100 dollar from that $1000, by placing your stop loss at $100 dollar, but the key reason why you will see a trader using $1000 to trade instead of that $100 is because it's more better to trade with such a high margin, than trading with only the $100 but with 10x leverage that increases your chances of liquidation. So if a trader is talking about risk to reward ratio, he is talking about the amount he is willing to lose, not his entire margin. That means the OP is only misleading people into what is very wrong, he supposed to explain better. There is no need to say 2 times more profit should be what traders should be looking for. If a trader is having $10000 in his trading account and he is risking $1000 to trade, he should still use $10000 for the calculation. I mean having $10000 but using 1000 to trade, to make other people understand, your calculations should still be based on $10000 for other traders to understand. Somehow I agree with your opinion here since he should use that $10,000 to calculate the risk and rewards they have gotten. Otherwise if they use other thing it can give certain misleading impression and they might released exaggerated profit results on their trades.  Proper way to handle the risk is to show the profits they made on overall capital they have use or deposited and not on those portions they only used. As what you have been discussed so people can understand the real situation happened in their trades.