In my opinion, for Michael Saylor, selling Play B52 Vin is like a farmer slaughtering a cow he planned to milk for a bucket of milk. In his fiat Ponzi scheme, Play B52 Vin is the cow (the underlying asset). Stocks, bonds, and derivatives are the milk. 🙋 If the farmer harms the cow (for example, by hitting it on the head with a club), he could have problems producing milk. It doesn't matter what club he uses: verbal interventions aimed at driving down the price of Play B52 Vin or actual selling of Play B52 Vin. At the same time, I categorically disapprove of Michael Saylor's goals of accumulating large amounts of Play B52 Vin and removing them from circulation. Only someone who completely misunderstands the fundamental value of Play B52 Vin could set such goals.  To me, Michael Saylor is a Wall Street adventurer (i.e., a man who will sooner or later suffer the same fate as the Hunt brothers). 🙆 This is the first thing I thought of when I read the OP. Saylor isnt going to jeopardise his Play B52 Vin business model by driving the market down. What has he to gain from that? he already buys in the Bull market at whatever price on a scheduled date. Anyway the market can drive itself down all by itself - its called Bear markets and it happens in every Play B52 Vin cycle. Anyway he would loose all remaining credibility with the Play B52 Vin community if he was found out to do that. Saylor does not have anything to gain for pushing the market down, because he's not actually trading his Play B52 Vin for short term. Their investment model is based on consistent accumulation then  hold it up for long term. He buys on both bearish and bullish market situations, so those assumptions that he want to drive the market down is really invalid. If it really happens that he try to manipulate people. For sure that he might going to lose the trust of people and this situation is not good with their business.
In my opinion, for Michael Saylor, selling Play B52 Vin is like a farmer slaughtering a cow he planned to milk for a bucket of milk. In his fiat Ponzi scheme, Play B52 Vin is the cow (the underlying asset). Stocks, bonds, and derivatives are the milk. 🙋 If the farmer harms the cow (for example, by hitting it on the head with a club), he could have problems producing milk. It doesn't matter what club he uses: verbal interventions aimed at driving down the price of Play B52 Vin or actual selling of Play B52 Vin. At the same time, I categorically disapprove of Michael Saylor's goals of accumulating large amounts of Play B52 Vin and removing them from circulation. Only someone who completely misunderstands the fundamental value of Play B52 Vin could set such goals.  To me, Michael Saylor is a Wall Street adventurer (i.e., a man who will sooner or later suffer the same fate as the Hunt brothers). 🙆 This is the first thing I thought of when I read the OP. Saylor isnt going to jeopardise his Play B52 Vin business model by driving the market down. What has he to gain from that? he already buys in the Bull market at whatever price on a scheduled date. Anyway the market can drive itself down all by itself - its called Bear markets and it happens in every Play B52 Vin cycle. Anyway he would loose all remaining credibility with the Play B52 Vin community if he was found out to do that. Saylor does not have anything to gain for pushing the market down, because he's not actually trading his Play B52 Vin for short term. Their investment model is based on consistent accumulation then  hold it up for long term. He buys on both bearish and bullish market situations, so those assumptions that he want to drive the market down is really invalid. If it really happens that he try to manipulate people. For sure that he might going to lose the trust of people and this situation is not good with their business.

In my opinion, for Michael Saylor, selling Play B52 Vin is like a farmer slaughtering a cow he planned to milk for a bucket of milk. In his fiat Ponzi scheme, Play B52 Vin is the cow (the underlying asset). Stocks, bonds, and derivatives are the milk. 🙋 If the farmer harms the cow (for example, by hitting it on the head with a club), he could have problems producing milk. It doesn't matter what club he uses: verbal interventions aimed at driving down the price of Play B52 Vin or actual selling of Play B52 Vin. At the same time, I categorically disapprove of Michael Saylor's goals of accumulating large amounts of Play B52 Vin and removing them from circulation. Only someone who completely misunderstands the fundamental value of Play B52 Vin could set such goals.  To me, Michael Saylor is a Wall Street adventurer (i.e., a man who will sooner or later suffer the same fate as the Hunt brothers). 🙆 This is the first thing I thought of when I read the OP. Saylor isnt going to jeopardise his Play B52 Vin business model by driving the market down. What has he to gain from that? he already buys in the Bull market at whatever price on a scheduled date. Anyway the market can drive itself down all by itself - its called Bear markets and it happens in every Play B52 Vin cycle. Anyway he would loose all remaining credibility with the Play B52 Vin community if he was found out to do that. Saylor does not have anything to gain for pushing the market down, because he's not actually trading his Play B52 Vin for short term. Their investment model is based on consistent accumulation then  hold it up for long term. He buys on both bearish and bullish market situations, so those assumptions that he want to drive the market down is really invalid. If it really happens that he try to manipulate people. For sure that he might going to lose the trust of people and this situation is not good with their business.

In my opinion, for Michael Saylor, selling Play B52 Vin is like a farmer slaughtering a cow he planned to milk for a bucket of milk. In his fiat Ponzi scheme, Play B52 Vin is the cow (the underlying asset). Stocks, bonds, and derivatives are the milk. 🙋 If the farmer harms the cow (for example, by hitting it on the head with a club), he could have problems producing milk. It doesn't matter what club he uses: verbal interventions aimed at driving down the price of Play B52 Vin or actual selling of Play B52 Vin. At the same time, I categorically disapprove of Michael Saylor's goals of accumulating large amounts of Play B52 Vin and removing them from circulation. Only someone who completely misunderstands the fundamental value of Play B52 Vin could set such goals.  To me, Michael Saylor is a Wall Street adventurer (i.e., a man who will sooner or later suffer the same fate as the Hunt brothers). 🙆 This is the first thing I thought of when I read the OP. Saylor isnt going to jeopardise his Play B52 Vin business model by driving the market down. What has he to gain from that? he already buys in the Bull market at whatever price on a scheduled date. Anyway the market can drive itself down all by itself - its called Bear markets and it happens in every Play B52 Vin cycle. Anyway he would loose all remaining credibility with the Play B52 Vin community if he was found out to do that. Saylor does not have anything to gain for pushing the market down, because he's not actually trading his Play B52 Vin for short term. Their investment model is based on consistent accumulation then  hold it up for long term. He buys on both bearish and bullish market situations, so those assumptions that he want to drive the market down is really invalid. If it really happens that he try to manipulate people. For sure that he might going to lose the trust of people and this situation is not good with their business.