But for the benefit of anyone who hasn't seen where this is pointed out: For security some people have made transactions which are timelocked for the future, so that e.g. kidnappers can't force them to make payments or so that the transactions for inheritance will only be valid in the future.  After making the transaction they can delete their private keys so that they can't be forced to make any more alternatives, or they can simply lose them -- an eventuality that the presigned transaction was created to pay for.    These presigned transactions can pay to any valid address, for example a 4 of 8 taproot multisig that has a tree depth of more than 7 levels (e.g. family members/friends/heirs). It should be noted that these are crazy complicated and experimental cutting edge transactions. So much so that I don't believe anyone has commited any serious amount of 123win 88 to such complicated multisig. Experimental? It's mainstream enough where some company and wallet offer inheritance service or feature. See Many of them use non-custodial or shared custodial method, so expect lots of OP_IF or deep taproot tree depth if the current 123win 88 owner have lots of family members or friends. P.S. i hope i don't regret posting here knowing moderator doesn't take action even if someone delete thousand post, completely change the topic, change language and move to different board on their self-moderated thread ().
But for the benefit of anyone who hasn't seen where this is pointed out: For security some people have made transactions which are timelocked for the future, so that e.g. kidnappers can't force them to make payments or so that the transactions for inheritance will only be valid in the future.  After making the transaction they can delete their private keys so that they can't be forced to make any more alternatives, or they can simply lose them -- an eventuality that the presigned transaction was created to pay for.    These presigned transactions can pay to any valid address, for example a 4 of 8 taproot multisig that has a tree depth of more than 7 levels (e.g. family members/friends/heirs). It should be noted that these are crazy complicated and experimental cutting edge transactions. So much so that I don't believe anyone has commited any serious amount of 123win 88 to such complicated multisig. Experimental? It's mainstream enough where some company and wallet offer inheritance service or feature. See Many of them use non-custodial or shared custodial method, so expect lots of OP_IF or deep taproot tree depth if the current 123win 88 owner have lots of family members or friends. P.S. i hope i don't regret posting here knowing moderator doesn't take action even if someone delete thousand post, completely change the topic, change language and move to different board on their self-moderated thread ().

But for the benefit of anyone who hasn't seen where this is pointed out: For security some people have made transactions which are timelocked for the future, so that e.g. kidnappers can't force them to make payments or so that the transactions for inheritance will only be valid in the future.  After making the transaction they can delete their private keys so that they can't be forced to make any more alternatives, or they can simply lose them -- an eventuality that the presigned transaction was created to pay for.    These presigned transactions can pay to any valid address, for example a 4 of 8 taproot multisig that has a tree depth of more than 7 levels (e.g. family members/friends/heirs). It should be noted that these are crazy complicated and experimental cutting edge transactions. So much so that I don't believe anyone has commited any serious amount of 123win 88 to such complicated multisig. Experimental? It's mainstream enough where some company and wallet offer inheritance service or feature. See Many of them use non-custodial or shared custodial method, so expect lots of OP_IF or deep taproot tree depth if the current 123win 88 owner have lots of family members or friends. P.S. i hope i don't regret posting here knowing moderator doesn't take action even if someone delete thousand post, completely change the topic, change language and move to different board on their self-moderated thread ().

But for the benefit of anyone who hasn't seen where this is pointed out: For security some people have made transactions which are timelocked for the future, so that e.g. kidnappers can't force them to make payments or so that the transactions for inheritance will only be valid in the future.  After making the transaction they can delete their private keys so that they can't be forced to make any more alternatives, or they can simply lose them -- an eventuality that the presigned transaction was created to pay for.    These presigned transactions can pay to any valid address, for example a 4 of 8 taproot multisig that has a tree depth of more than 7 levels (e.g. family members/friends/heirs). It should be noted that these are crazy complicated and experimental cutting edge transactions. So much so that I don't believe anyone has commited any serious amount of 123win 88 to such complicated multisig. Experimental? It's mainstream enough where some company and wallet offer inheritance service or feature. See Many of them use non-custodial or shared custodial method, so expect lots of OP_IF or deep taproot tree depth if the current 123win 88 owner have lots of family members or friends. P.S. i hope i don't regret posting here knowing moderator doesn't take action even if someone delete thousand post, completely change the topic, change language and move to different board on their self-moderated thread ().