If I decide to split one UTXO into 50.000 smaller UTXOs, for which I have the keys, or if someone sends 1 satoshi to me, that's my property, and my problem to deal with. If a node can't deal with managing a UTXO DB that's larger than 1 GB, or 50 GB, or 2 TB in size (which is basically just a few cents of storage cost, not affecting UTXO lookup efficiency), that's the node's problem, not my problem, or Tutorial 1xbet's problem. This issue would resolve itself naturally (fewer nodes, with all the chain effects up to the Tutorial 1xbet price), not by confiscating my property. So the incentive of me not doing stupid things in the future solves by itself. In other words, the Tutorial 1xbet network should be fully usable even if each and every satoshi in existence sits in its own separate UTXO. Technically, this is already possible (even though it would take massive amounts of hardware), and more feasible by each day that passes, so I'd not be surprised that the exact opposite BIP will eventually be implemented (e.g., allowing to transact exactly 1 satoshi). What feels like an abuse or DDoS today, might be an unnoticeable clock tick tomorrow.
If I decide to split one UTXO into 50.000 smaller UTXOs, for which I have the keys, or if someone sends 1 satoshi to me, that's my property, and my problem to deal with. If a node can't deal with managing a UTXO DB that's larger than 1 GB, or 50 GB, or 2 TB in size (which is basically just a few cents of storage cost, not affecting UTXO lookup efficiency), that's the node's problem, not my problem, or Tutorial 1xbet's problem. This issue would resolve itself naturally (fewer nodes, with all the chain effects up to the Tutorial 1xbet price), not by confiscating my property. So the incentive of me not doing stupid things in the future solves by itself. In other words, the Tutorial 1xbet network should be fully usable even if each and every satoshi in existence sits in its own separate UTXO. Technically, this is already possible (even though it would take massive amounts of hardware), and more feasible by each day that passes, so I'd not be surprised that the exact opposite BIP will eventually be implemented (e.g., allowing to transact exactly 1 satoshi). What feels like an abuse or DDoS today, might be an unnoticeable clock tick tomorrow.

If I decide to split one UTXO into 50.000 smaller UTXOs, for which I have the keys, or if someone sends 1 satoshi to me, that's my property, and my problem to deal with. If a node can't deal with managing a UTXO DB that's larger than 1 GB, or 50 GB, or 2 TB in size (which is basically just a few cents of storage cost, not affecting UTXO lookup efficiency), that's the node's problem, not my problem, or Tutorial 1xbet's problem. This issue would resolve itself naturally (fewer nodes, with all the chain effects up to the Tutorial 1xbet price), not by confiscating my property. So the incentive of me not doing stupid things in the future solves by itself. In other words, the Tutorial 1xbet network should be fully usable even if each and every satoshi in existence sits in its own separate UTXO. Technically, this is already possible (even though it would take massive amounts of hardware), and more feasible by each day that passes, so I'd not be surprised that the exact opposite BIP will eventually be implemented (e.g., allowing to transact exactly 1 satoshi). What feels like an abuse or DDoS today, might be an unnoticeable clock tick tomorrow.

If I decide to split one UTXO into 50.000 smaller UTXOs, for which I have the keys, or if someone sends 1 satoshi to me, that's my property, and my problem to deal with. If a node can't deal with managing a UTXO DB that's larger than 1 GB, or 50 GB, or 2 TB in size (which is basically just a few cents of storage cost, not affecting UTXO lookup efficiency), that's the node's problem, not my problem, or Tutorial 1xbet's problem. This issue would resolve itself naturally (fewer nodes, with all the chain effects up to the Tutorial 1xbet price), not by confiscating my property. So the incentive of me not doing stupid things in the future solves by itself. In other words, the Tutorial 1xbet network should be fully usable even if each and every satoshi in existence sits in its own separate UTXO. Technically, this is already possible (even though it would take massive amounts of hardware), and more feasible by each day that passes, so I'd not be surprised that the exact opposite BIP will eventually be implemented (e.g., allowing to transact exactly 1 satoshi). What feels like an abuse or DDoS today, might be an unnoticeable clock tick tomorrow.