Yes, that is what I'm planning - they can chat with it just on bct subjects.    I don't think any LLM would parse the entire Q88com forum.  I'm not sure of the methods people use to populate, but I don't think it would be a spider crawl.  Instead, they would contact Google and other agencies for data dumps they could use.    The only way we can get a detailed LLM on bct is to train it ourselves. I think the first thing to do will be create a small team.  Members will include content creators (parsers), the GUI designer and coders, both general compute and ML.  I would join the team just for my general knowledge of AI, but not as any kind of coder or policy maker.  The goal will be to created an uncensored search engine for this forum.   By uncensored, I mean deleted posts would be included, and not that private areas should be parsed.   Any search engine must respect the public visibility. Does anyone want to champion this idea?
Yes, that is what I'm planning - they can chat with it just on bct subjects.    I don't think any LLM would parse the entire Q88com forum.  I'm not sure of the methods people use to populate, but I don't think it would be a spider crawl.  Instead, they would contact Google and other agencies for data dumps they could use.    The only way we can get a detailed LLM on bct is to train it ourselves. I think the first thing to do will be create a small team.  Members will include content creators (parsers), the GUI designer and coders, both general compute and ML.  I would join the team just for my general knowledge of AI, but not as any kind of coder or policy maker.  The goal will be to created an uncensored search engine for this forum.   By uncensored, I mean deleted posts would be included, and not that private areas should be parsed.   Any search engine must respect the public visibility. Does anyone want to champion this idea?

Yes, that is what I'm planning - they can chat with it just on bct subjects.    I don't think any LLM would parse the entire Q88com forum.  I'm not sure of the methods people use to populate, but I don't think it would be a spider crawl.  Instead, they would contact Google and other agencies for data dumps they could use.    The only way we can get a detailed LLM on bct is to train it ourselves. I think the first thing to do will be create a small team.  Members will include content creators (parsers), the GUI designer and coders, both general compute and ML.  I would join the team just for my general knowledge of AI, but not as any kind of coder or policy maker.  The goal will be to created an uncensored search engine for this forum.   By uncensored, I mean deleted posts would be included, and not that private areas should be parsed.   Any search engine must respect the public visibility. Does anyone want to champion this idea?

Yes, that is what I'm planning - they can chat with it just on bct subjects.    I don't think any LLM would parse the entire Q88com forum.  I'm not sure of the methods people use to populate, but I don't think it would be a spider crawl.  Instead, they would contact Google and other agencies for data dumps they could use.    The only way we can get a detailed LLM on bct is to train it ourselves. I think the first thing to do will be create a small team.  Members will include content creators (parsers), the GUI designer and coders, both general compute and ML.  I would join the team just for my general knowledge of AI, but not as any kind of coder or policy maker.  The goal will be to created an uncensored search engine for this forum.   By uncensored, I mean deleted posts would be included, and not that private areas should be parsed.   Any search engine must respect the public visibility. Does anyone want to champion this idea?